I'm using msdeploy to sync files from one server to another server in web farm. I'm currently using files sync only like theres a A folder and 100s file added to
that folder ,i've synced those files calling 100 times msdeploy api to another server .is that ok or wrong and
i want to know the time taken by syncing 100 files separately and syncing A folder having 100 files at single call which one is more reliable and faster?
Using DFS might be an option for you. Otherwise, the synch process only synchs changed files, so there's really no difference. Synching a file only makes sense if you are synching a single file.
Member
42 Points
78 Posts
which one is better file sync or folder sync?
Nov 27, 2013 01:11 AM|bakamaru|LINK
Hi
I'm using msdeploy to sync files from one server to another server in web farm. I'm currently using files sync only like theres a A folder and 100s file added to
that folder ,i've synced those files calling 100 times msdeploy api to another server .is that ok or wrong and
i want to know the time taken by syncing 100 files separately and syncing A folder having 100 files at single call which one is more reliable and faster?
can any body explain ?
thank you
webfarmframework,msdeploy
All-Star
25749 Points
10436 Posts
Re: which one is better file sync or folder sync?
Nov 27, 2013 01:47 PM|jeff@zina.com|LINK
Using DFS might be an option for you. Otherwise, the synch process only synchs changed files, so there's really no difference. Synching a file only makes sense if you are synching a single file.
Jeff
webfarmframework,msdeploy