Last post Apr 14, 2009 10:23 PM by suanleba
Mar 11, 2009 06:10 AM|suanleba|LINK
Mar 16, 2009 05:32 AM|suanleba|LINK
any advice about this question? thanks.
Mar 16, 2009 02:45 PMemail@example.com|LINK
These really aren't ASP.NET questions, you'll want to look at www.iis.net to see the limitations of using a workstation OS as a web server (in your case, a single site, ten concurrent connection limit). You can use XP and SQL Express, but you may find limitations.
SQL Express has no significant limitations for web server use. You can check Microsoft's web site for other requirements and limitations of the various software versions.
That said, use a web host. It's cheaper, faster, easier and more reliable. If you're asking this type of question, you don't have the expertise or knowledge to reliably run a web server.
Apr 14, 2009 10:23 PM|suanleba|LINK
we have IT department, if I know the requirement for server set up to host my website, then I can request IT to allow us user one of their server which windows server 2003 and SQL server 2008 installed to host our website, it's cost saving as well.
my question is: compare SQL server 2008 with SQL server 2008 express (free), windows server 2003 and windows XP, which one is the limitation for users concurrent connect to my website, I read an article side SQL server 2008 express is just suitable for less
than 20 users to use in
http://www.devx.com/MicrosoftISV/Article/38728 I need to know this clearly, I try to find a windows server 2003 based server in our IT department (it's easy), but I need SQL server 2008 or SQL server 2008 express in the server? my website has less than 2
GB database, but more than 50 users concurrent access my website is preferable.