Sorry, you seem to have misunderstood what I meant to say. I was saying that I'm always going to be replacing the default container with a fully functional container using an adapter if necessary. There's nothing difficult to understand about the current
design, disagreeing that a conforming container was the right way to go is a different thing to not understanding how it works.
To be honest, it's clear that Microsoft are locked into this path so we'll just see how it pans out.
None
0 Points
5 Posts
Re: Feedback on ASP.NET vNext Dependency Injection
Jul 08, 2014 03:32 AM|Rob89|LINK
Sorry, you seem to have misunderstood what I meant to say. I was saying that I'm always going to be replacing the default container with a fully functional container using an adapter if necessary. There's nothing difficult to understand about the current design, disagreeing that a conforming container was the right way to go is a different thing to not understanding how it works.
To be honest, it's clear that Microsoft are locked into this path so we'll just see how it pans out.
DI