Browse by Tags

Related Posts

  • What is the best approach to take for providers

    With my ASP.NET 2.0 application, I have set up SQL providers for membership, roles, and personalization and I have recently started experimenting with Exchange 2007 Web Services. I have a SQL database that I have extended to support all of the providers using the aspnet_regsql -A all -E. That filled...
    Posted to Configuration and Deployment (Forum) by AaronBenage on 09-12-2008, 12:00 AM
    Filed under: membership, Providers, windows authentication
  • Membership - what's the "best practice" ?

    Recently I've been wondering. What's the "best practice" when it comes to creating webapps with user authentication/authorization? This may be stupid, but whatever :) What I'm wondering is, should I just use the default provider, storing membership/profile/role data in a separate...
    Posted to Security (Forum) by l3dx on 08-29-2008, 12:00 AM
    Filed under: providers, membership
  • Re: applicationName

    Guys !!! I am having the same problem as above... In this kind of critical scenario, I am expecting some answer from asp.net moderator.... Please.. Like initially when i started dealing with aspnetdb, i kept applicationname="\" , and then after some time i changed it to applicationname="myapplication"...
    Posted to Security (Forum) by BhaveshPatel on 08-02-2007, 12:00 AM
    Filed under: personalisation, Roles Provider, Security - membership, Security membership, ASPNETDB, CreateUserWizard asp.net, domain aspnet_users membership provider prefix, FormsAuthentication, FormsAuthentication authorization web.config, formsAuthentication membership roleproviderr, membership, Membership Provider, method, membership authentication, providers, asp.neTt 2.0 memembership, asp.net configuration tool, LOGIN DATABASE ASPNETDB USERS, ASP.NET Authentication, authentication
Page 1 of 1 (3 items)