Home ›
All Tags » architecture » debate (RSS)

Browse by Tags

Related Posts

  • Re: Debate: Do We Really Need Three Layer Architecture?

    So far, few replies include the reality that we can’t really ignore the possibility of having new database vendor in future. Well, first it happens really rare to switch from one database vendor to another, and I guess 95%+ ASP.NET applications are using SQL Server as database vendor, which has been...
    Posted to Architecture (Forum) by joycsharp on 11-04-2008, 12:00 AM
    Filed under: architecture, debate, layered architecture, .net 2.0

  • Debate: Do We Really Need Three Layer Architecture?

    How many of you changed your database vendor (i.e. Sql Server, Access) after developing an application? How many of your data entities include business logic? I could say, less than 10% in both cases for my case. I found the similar statistics for my other known developers. I guess this is true for less...
    Posted to Architecture (Forum) by joycsharp on 11-04-2008, 12:00 AM
    Filed under: architecture, Asp.Net 2.0, debate, layered architecture
Page 1 of 1 (2 items)

Contact | Advertise | Issue Management by Axosoft's OnTime | Running IIS7
All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use | Trademarks | Privacy Statement
© 2009 Microsoft Corporation.