Your opinion: Are CSS friendly Adapters dead in 2010?http://forums.asp.net/t/1513433.aspx/1?Your+opinion+Are+CSS+friendly+Adapters+dead+in+2010+Thu, 13 May 2010 02:47:20 -040015134333613041http://forums.asp.net/p/1513433/3613041.aspx/1?Your+opinion+Are+CSS+friendly+Adapters+dead+in+2010+Your opinion: Are CSS friendly Adapters dead in 2010? <p>What do you think? Is it wise to start to use CSS Friendly adapters at this point (2010) with these observations in mind:</p> <ul> <li>VS2010 and .Net4 are coming and may offer something new </li><li>MVC is an option if you really want to manage your page layout </li><li>Microsoft is not involved with CSSFA </li><li>The codeplex project seems to be sleeping along </li><li>It's been 4 years since it started</li></ul> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Is there a better way to get control of the HTML emitted by ASP.Net controls? I for one&nbsp; am fed up with wrestling with the failures of browsers to handle the table code properly (e.g. applying classes) yet I am fearful of going down the CSS road when it seems so stale. What do you think? Your recommendation?</p> 2010-01-12T15:19:05-05:003613189http://forums.asp.net/p/1513433/3613189.aspx/1?Re+Your+opinion+Are+CSS+friendly+Adapters+dead+in+2010+Re: Your opinion: Are CSS friendly Adapters dead in 2010? <p>If you are going to convert your project to asp.net 4 then you wont need the css friendly adapters. </p> <p>All asp.net webforms controls have been fully revised for 4 and support proper standards compliant tableless markup.</p> <p><br> </p> <p>If your project is going to stay with an older version then you should still use the CSS adapters.<br> </p> 2010-01-12T16:35:27-05:003615198http://forums.asp.net/p/1513433/3615198.aspx/1?Re+Your+opinion+Are+CSS+friendly+Adapters+dead+in+2010+Re: Your opinion: Are CSS friendly Adapters dead in 2010? <p>Thanks, that's fairly clear. Will there be an option to continue to use the old table style output? I ask because it would seem that projects would be difficult to upgrade (detailed examination of every page required, especially with regard to CSS?)</p> 2010-01-13T13:17:39-05:003615330http://forums.asp.net/p/1513433/3615330.aspx/1?Re+Your+opinion+Are+CSS+friendly+Adapters+dead+in+2010+Re: Your opinion: Are CSS friendly Adapters dead in 2010? <p>Yes its an attribute that you add to turn on the css friendly formatting.<br> </p> <p><br> </p> <p>You can see some pretty detailed info on this at:</p> <ul> <li><a href="http://www.asp.net/LEARN/whitepapers/aspnet4/default.aspx#_TOC3_11">http://www.asp.net/LEARN/whitepapers/aspnet4/default.aspx#_TOC3_11</a><br> </li></ul> 2010-01-13T14:07:36-05:003783241http://forums.asp.net/p/1513433/3783241.aspx/1?Re+Your+opinion+Are+CSS+friendly+Adapters+dead+in+2010+Re: Your opinion: Are CSS friendly Adapters dead in 2010? <p>Can I have css friendly controls only with the 4.0 framework and visual studio 2008 or I must also use visual studio 2010?</p> 2010-04-13T22:30:34-04:003833781http://forums.asp.net/p/1513433/3833781.aspx/1?Re+Your+opinion+Are+CSS+friendly+Adapters+dead+in+2010+Re: Your opinion: Are CSS friendly Adapters dead in 2010? <p></p> <blockquote><span class="icon-blockquote"></span> <h4>rtpHarry</h4> <p></p> <p>All asp.net webforms controls have been fully revised for 4 and support proper standards compliant tableless markup.</p> <p></p> </blockquote> <p></p> <p>I fired up a .NET 4 web application with VS2010 and it seems to me (unless I did something wrong) that the Calendar control hasn't been touched at all (probably since it was written for 2.0 or even older versions). It still has hard-coded inline CSS calls and auto-postback Javascript that cannot be overwritten (in a few places).&nbsp;</p> <p>Am I missing something? Thanks.</p> <p></p> 2010-05-13T02:47:20-04:00