Remoting Assembly required locally? RSS

• • Reply
  

  jportelas

  Contributor

  2728 Points

  591 Posts

  Remoting Assembly required locally?

  Oct 15, 2003 12:33 AM|LINK

  Hi there: I've being testing something on remoting and I've found that the remote assembly needs to be referenced locally while development, can I develop directly on the remote assembly??? This takes me to the next question, when I deploy the client application that uses the remote assembly, the "remote" assembly needs to be deployed with the APP so this app won't throw any error when loading all the required or referenced assemblies as in the manifiest??? Thanks for your help, any links or documents on this will be apreciated. Bye
• • Reply
  

  dfoderick

  Participant

  815 Points

  163 Posts

  Re: Remoting Assembly required locally?

  Oct 15, 2003 08:29 PM|LINK

  This is a common requirement and you should be able to find a lot of information out on the web for this. http://www.ingorammer.com/RemotingFAQ/USEINTERFACESWITHCONFIGFILES.html Obviously the client needs metadata about the remote object so it can create the proxy and call the methods.
  ~Dave Foderick
  
  
  
• • Reply
  

  jportelas

  Contributor

  2728 Points

  591 Posts

  Re: Remoting Assembly required locally?

  Oct 16, 2003 01:51 PM|LINK

  So, in the URL they suggest to use interfaces instead of the class by itself, so the DLL holding the interfaces definitions would still have to be deployed with the App right??? I thought this would be more kind of a Web service where the metadata was provided by the wsdl, proxy and disco files. Besides this suggested approach.. there are no other way? Thanks
• • Reply
  

  dfoderick

  Participant

  815 Points

  163 Posts

  Re: Remoting Assembly required locally?

  Oct 20, 2003 05:01 PM|LINK

  Again, ingo has the answer. You can try soapsuds but if your app is complex it might not work: http://www.ingorammer.com/RemotingFAQ/SoapSudsOrInterfaces.html
  ~Dave Foderick