You searched for the word(s): userid:85664

More Search Options

RSS Available

• System.Drawing Error: Can or Cannot it be used in an ASP.Net application

  We are using System.Drawing in and application to manipulate images in a web application (rotate, flip, etc). For the last month we have been getting the following error very sporadically. "Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt." Based on the MSDN Library it appears that we should not be using System.Drawing in our web application (see insert below). Classes within the System.Drawing.Imaging namespace are not supported for

  Posted to System.Drawing/GDI+ (Forum) by smehaffie on 7/10/2009
  Filed under: GDI+, ASP.NET, system.drawing, system.drawing exceptions asp.net, MemoryStream, A generic error occurred in GDI+

• Re: ASP.NET 3.5 Installation Problems

  Remember 3.0 and 3.5 are not really major upgrades (despite the numbering). Both just add additional libraries that your .Net applications can use (WPF, WCF, etc). So in IIS sites that use these extra libraries still run under .Net 2.0 in IIS. So to answer your question the way to disallow 3.0/3.5 is to dissallow .Net 2.0 (since there are really one and the same as far as the core code is concerned. MS mad a big marketing mistake when they names them 3.0 and 3.5, they should have been 2.1 and 2.2

  Posted to Installation and Setup (Forum) by smehaffie on 2/23/2009

• Re: SourceSafe - Plug-In Question

  Thanks, so basically rebinding the projects using the IDE also changes these settings, correct? Does the rebinding do any additional changes, other than change these settings in the solution/project source control files?

  Posted to Visual Studio 2005 (Forum) by smehaffie on 2/11/2008

• SourceSafe - Plug-In Question

  We need to move our SouceSafe database to a new server and I can access the database in the new location using the client application. My problem is that when we open a project in VS2005, the project shows it still using the old SourceSafe DB. I can rebind this to the new location (after changing the plugin so it "prompts for database" instead of "use default"), but I do not want to do that for all our projects. What I want to know is what do I need to do so that VS2005 automatically

  Posted to Visual Studio 2005 (Forum) by smehaffie on 2/8/2008

• Re: Unit Testing Web Application

  Thanks. I will check out NUnitASP. I was hoping to use the built in UnitTest functionality in VS2008I. Any help to get this to work using the integrated testing tool would be appreciated.

  Posted to Visual Studio 2008 (Forum) by smehaffie on 12/30/2007

• Unit Testing Web Application

  I have a WSP web application that I want to write unit test for. The issue I am having is that a good majority of the code that I want to test needs to read settings from the web.config file to do a really valid test. I could put the settings in the app.config file for the unit test, and that would at least allow me to verify the test runs correctly but not that it gets the data from the web.config file correctly. This is not a major issue, just wondering if I there is a way for the test to run as

  Posted to Visual Studio 2008 (Forum) by smehaffie on 12/29/2007

• Re: HttpHandler / Http Module (Can it be done).

  We use application caching and this is on a web farm. When the user updates any data in the cache I have code that calls a web method on each each individual server to refresh that servers caches. Therefore, I cannot have 2 sites mysite.com\{appname} and {appname}.mysite.com since updating the cache using 1 URL would not update the cache for the other URL since they are the different applications/sites. That is why I need the application to see everyone coming to {appname}.mysite.com not matter what

  Posted to HttpHandlers and HttpModules (Forum) by smehaffie on 8/11/2007

• Re: HttpHandler / Http Module (Can it be done).

  Al I know that DNS resolves the URL and both URL's would resolve to the same IP, thus going to the same site. What I want to do is change the URL using an HttpHandler or Http Module on the front end before to change the mysite.com\{appname} to {appname}.mysite.com. I do remember attending a seminar where something similar was done with an httpHandler, but do not remember how it was done.

  Posted to HttpHandlers and HttpModules (Forum) by smehaffie on 8/8/2007

• HttpHandler / Http Module (Can it be done).

  I have a site that currently has a URL like www.mysite.com\{appname} I am migrating to a new server and want to change the URL to follow our new standard {appname}.mysite.com The site is for serving up web services and our current customers must not see any outages, or need to make any changes to continue to work. I am thinking I can write httpHandler or HttpModule and changed the www.mysite.com\{appname} to {appname}.mysite.com . Can this be done this way? If so, is this the best way to handle this

  Posted to HttpHandlers and HttpModules (Forum) by smehaffie on 8/7/2007

• Deployment Question

  When you deploy a SQLExpress database with our application that is installed locally, what are the best practices for doing the following. 1) If SQLExpress is not installed locally, should you create the SQLInstance using the default instance name "SQLExpress" or should your application create an application specific instance of SQL? 2) If SQLExpress is already installed locally should you use the default instance, let the user choose what database to use, or create an application specific

  Posted to SQL Server, SQL Server Express, and SqlDataSource Control (Forum) by smehaffie on 7/13/2007