You searched for the word(s): userid:83066

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: How to Remove Content from Dynamic ASPX site that is SE Friendly

  Perhaps. That's the question. Google and every other search engine on the planet are smart enough to know that default.aspx?page=1 is different from default.aspx?page=2, so I don't see why issuing a 410 response for the deleted content wouldn't work just fine. I *do not* know this for sure, however, so I'd advise that the original poster searches around, and perhaps asks this question on a webmaster or search engine specific forum, rather than the architecture forum of a .NET specific site. This

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by Testosteles on 10/17/2005

• Re: How to Remove Content from Dynamic ASPX site that is SE Friendly

  You probably want to use a different http response, such as 410 (Gone). I believe that most search engines are smart enough to delete pages from their indices based on this. You might want to do further research to figure out if search engines will just delete the specific page, and not *every* page based off of that default.aspx. I'm a little fuzzy on this myself. If you find anything let us know. I'll be doing something similar in the near future myself.

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by Testosteles on 10/17/2005

• Re: Comparing J2EE's DAO, VO etc with ASP.NET architecture

  As stated in other responses, patterns are patterns are patterns. Everything that worked for you in Java land will work in C# land. The only major difference is the presentation layer, as ASP.NET web forms are very different from the MVC2 model of Struts or most other Java UI technologies.

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by Testosteles on 9/22/2005

• Re: O/R Mappers that work in Medium Level Trust ?

  I may be wrong, but I believe you can configure WORM to work against public properties instead of private fields. I think this would solve your problem.

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by Testosteles on 7/17/2005

• Re: Should I use user controls?

  UserControls are basically just aggregates of other controls (server controls, other UserControls, and literal controls/html), so my advice would be to separate out the user interface pieces into individual UserControls based on the functionality that each role can see. Then, you simply load the UserControls programmatically (ie; into a PlaceHolder control) based on what each role can access. For example: public void Page_Load{ if( User.IsInRole( "Administrator" ){ this.headerPlaceHolder.Controls

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by Testosteles on 7/11/2005

• Re: Real NHibernate Example App

  Scott Bellware actually set up a more in-depth example, complete with powerpoint slides and unit tests: http://geekswithblogs.net/sbellware/archive/2005/05/18/39934.aspx

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by Testosteles on 5/27/2005

• Re: How do you close a connection opened in a Class file?

  First off, generally speaking you don't want to be sending data readers to the user interface level. They're for loading objects, and should be disposed of as quickly as possible, usually within the same method where they were created. If you simply must use a reader to bind directly to your UI, try this technique: Using Delegates with Data Readers to Control DAL Responsibility

  Posted to Data Access and ObjectDataSource Control (Forum) by Testosteles on 5/10/2005

• Re: HOW can I Retrieve value from the database?

  Or..... Just use the ExecuteScalar method of any IDbCommand object: Msdn Documentation of SqlCommand.ExecuteScalar Method

  Posted to Data Access and ObjectDataSource Control (Forum) by Testosteles on 5/10/2005

• Re: Struts like MVC Framework - done, need developers to check it out

  Thanks for the tip. I am currently experiencing gmail-induced fearlessness when it comes to spam, though. I've pasted that address online in quite a few places, and have yet to get any spam that isn't caught by the gmail filter. Yeah baby. Bring it on.

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by Testosteles on 5/4/2005

• Re: Struts like MVC Framework - done, need developers to check it out

  I'd love to take a look. It sounds interesting. jeffperrin@gmail.com

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by Testosteles on 5/4/2005