You searched for the word(s): userid:793250

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: .NET

  I'd generally go for one of the two options you've presented, 99% of the time just the console with task scheduler. I've heard of some nasty workarounds for an ASP.NET app, but we won't go there. You might even want to look at a tool such as Quartz.NET (the url is not the name - http://quartznet.sourceforge.net/). I haven't used it, but it seems pretty feature rich. There are others out there too.

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by benhart on 11/13/2008

• Re: Where to start learning?

  Absolutely awesome post! I vote it for a "sticky" in this forum. Moderators? Or maybe I'll just keep replying to it every few days to keep it near the top

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by benhart on 11/13/2008

• Re: Regarding 3-tier architecture...!!!

  [quote user="vivek_iit"] Let me explain: Most basic questions on architecture and design are not easy to answer in a single post. Queries like: 1. What is 3-tier architecture...? 2. How is it useful...? they need good explanations so that a developer can really understand the concept involved. In such questions people are not expecting a textbook definition but a detailed explanation with some sample code too. There are 100s of such questions being asked in this Architecture forum, and

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by benhart on 11/12/2008

• Re: Regarding 3-tier architecture...!!!

  [quote user="cutekids525"] Can u send me free online materials for 3 tier architecture... Diagrammatic representation is more appreciated... [/quote] Some plugging of my own . I wrote a post on layers vs. tiers, perhaps the description of tiers and diagrams therein will be of assistance. Post is here... There are many articles/posts out there. Have a read of mine, and let me know if you have any further questions. You'll probably have better luck with google if you change your seach

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by benhart on 11/12/2008

• Re: Debate: Do We Really Need Three Layer Architecture?

  [quote user="LudovicoVan"] The quote I'd paraphrase like this: << In software, lots of the practices on projects exist because “that’s the way all the cool people do it.” In other words, because of crazy monkeys. >> [/quote] Perhaps I'm missing the intended humour here, but I'd paraphrase it as << In software, lots of the practices on projects exists because people adopt those of the people that came before them without ever questioning and (more importantly

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by benhart on 11/11/2008

• Re: Debate: Do We Really Need Three Layer Architecture?

  Momcilo, that's a great quote. Thanks

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by benhart on 11/11/2008

• Re: Regarding 3-tier architecture...!!!

  [quote user="vivek_iit"] Hi, Refer this book for basics on Architecture & Design in ASP.NET 3.5 http://www.packtpub.com/application-architecture-and-design-for-asp-.net-3.5/book Hope this helps, Vivek [/quote] Dude, while I think it's great that you're promoting your book so well, your copying and pasting the same reply is starting to approach spam. Please don't take offence, I think it's great that you're trying to help, but rather stick to your other style of at

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by benhart on 11/11/2008

• Re: Debate: Do We Really Need Three Layer Architecture?

  As I've intimated, I don't have a layer (separate project or otherwise) called BLL or DAL, so I find it hard to imagine what a loosely intimate layered model might be. Is this a term that you've coined? Is it written up somewhere so I can understand better what you're referring to? I define object shapes and behaviours centrally, and make use of an ORM to map these to a database. These entities are loaded via 'abstracted' repositories (a known interface, for which the implementation

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by benhart on 11/7/2008

• Re: Debate: Do We Really Need Three Layer Architecture?

  Well if I can hop back in, and play a little devil's advocate myself... I agree whole heartedly with every comment made. But the pattern is clear, the separation into these concerns ensures greater maintainability, ability to change with time, and greater reuse. Adopting the "layered architecture" doesn't actually guarantee that. Done incorrectly you can find yourself with the same mesh of code with low cohesion and high coupling. I've seen BLL classes with nothing in them,

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by benhart on 11/4/2008

• Re: Deciding the suitable project architecture

  That's quite a broad question . I'd encourage you to check out ASP.NET MVC for a start, I think it is a much cleaner means to build web applications. Maybe spend some time watching the various screen casts, and shout if you have any questions. Do you need to connect to other systems, share you data with other systems? What database are you using? How many users? Intra or Internet? You need to start considering these and many other things, they all influence how your architecture will shake

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by benhart on 11/4/2008