You searched for the word(s): userid:779941

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: mvc toolkit img extensions

  Hi Rob, But if the community is wanting to use the helpers found in the toolkit, but can't change/patch/contribute to them because its closed source, isn't that just stifling the very spirit that has led rails to such UI rich helper methods? I would really like to see toolkit type helpers as an opensource project and to be honest I am not using the toolkit helpers currently because they are closed source. It deserves to be opensource. Im in no way trying to detract from the great work and

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by byron.walker on 1/30/2008

• Re: Bug in Route?

  To be restful, the routes should actually be written [controller]/[id]/[action]. Without hidden form fields and other such hackery to cater for browsers not handling the appropriate verbs, if you attempted to generate the 'new' restful url using this route you end up with Something//new which is incorrect. I believe the '//' should never pop out. The route builder shouldnt generate bad urls for which it could clearly cater.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by byron.walker on 1/28/2008

• Re: mvc toolkit img extensions

  To be honest i think the MVCToolkit stuff should be part of the MVCContrib project. Thats how rails do it and look how far ahead their html helpers are. Rob Conery has done a great job with it but helper methods like the ones found in the toolkit should be opensource.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by byron.walker on 1/28/2008

• Re: Bug in Route?

  Ive experienced the same issue and it becomes really apparent when using the SimplyRestfulRouting from MVCContrib. What I think would be appropriate behaviour is that if an argument is detected as null then the URL builder doesn't spit out a url with '//' which will throw bad requests but handle it appropriately. Was this a concious design descision, and can we get it changed?

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by byron.walker on 1/28/2008

• Re: Multiple actions on one page

  This solution has involves a destructive GET being the delete action. A crawler or a link checking tool will destroy data in this case and really should be avoided.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by byron.walker on 1/25/2008

• Re: MVC On II6 Without the ".mvc" Extension

  I make the same reply about performance as I always do. Show me a profile with a SIGNIFICANT difference in page load times AND that effect the usability of the site and Ill consider a more complex solution to better handle the routing. Otherwise, I like my urls without '.mvc' and so do my customers. Developer cycles are vastly more expensive than CPU cycles.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by byron.walker on 1/25/2008

• Re: Nested Form with an MVC View Page

  What if I disable javascript? Your solution will break. Its too obtrusive. You can have multiple submits per form all with name="submit" and have a submit parameter on the controller action. It means you have to switch over the submit value but ive found the solution to be maintainable.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by byron.walker on 1/25/2008

• Re: MVCHandler error

  Wrong attitude. As mentioned, your using a CTP. Put up or (you know the rest) As for the routes you posted, how are they expected to work when your urls on the page are pointing to resources as such - http://www.ashlen.com.au/News/About In order for the routing you setup to work, your url needs to be http://www.ashlen.com.au/News/About.mvc. If your getting a loader exception your missing a dll and the exceptions are misleading. As part of your deployment ftp ALL dlls in your bin folder of your local

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by byron.walker on 1/25/2008

• Re: Windows 2003 problems

  Trust me when I say you dont need any of the above to get your mvc app working on Windows 2003. Have a look at my post here for hints about setting up forms auth in ASP.NET. And here for how to get rid of the 'Default.aspx' route.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by byron.walker on 1/25/2008

• Re: MVC On II6 Without the ".mvc" Extension

  You do not need this degree of complication. Just add the wildcard mapping as suggested in the initial replies.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by byron.walker on 1/22/2008