You searched for the word(s): userid:776970

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: [BUG]Value from checkbox do not handle as parameter

  http://www.squaredroot.com/post/2007/12/MVC-Checkboxes-Complaint.aspx This blog had a pretty good rundown on how the current CTP handles checkboxes.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by Jonathan Holland on 12/24/2007

• Re: Using MVC Framework in production

  It is far to early in the development cycle to deploy a production application with the MVC framework. I predict many many changes to the API and functionality that would make upgrading to the next version of the framework difficult.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by Jonathan Holland on 12/22/2007

• Re: UpdateFrom and Encoding

  [quote user="damieng"] I think then you are missing the point of .NET with it's sandboxed VM, code access security, type safety, bounds checking, pointerless operations, garbage collection, trust levels... [)amien [/quote] Your right, lets just add Html Encoding at the CLR level. Encode all strings! Apples to Oranges.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by Jonathan Holland on 12/20/2007

• Re: RenderView ToString()

  I understand your point, and I think it is valid, though perhaps this is a situation where web forms is a better architecture instead of MVC. We have to be careful not to make everything into a nail now that we have the magic MVC hammer. Another thought I had is that instead of having the "MasterView" pass its own Viewdata to "dumb" partial views, instead it would be able to call other controllers, which would reach into the model to get their specific data, and pass this to a

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by Jonathan Holland on 12/20/2007

• Re: Preventing users from browsing to Models directory

  There are a couple ways to do this, you can use HTTPForbiddenHandler to explicitly disallow dbml files: <system.web> <httpHandlers> <add verb="*" path="*.dbml" type="System.Web.HttpForbiddenHandler" /> </httpHandlers> </system.web> Or you can lock down the directory in IIS.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by Jonathan Holland on 12/20/2007

• Re: UpdateFrom and Encoding

  I believe that the only responsibility of Microsoft is to provide the means to encode and decode HTML. The responsibility to use it is placed at the feet of the developer. Sure, ignorance leads to crappy, vulnerable sites....But that is not Microsoft's fault, and that is not really their problem. As you can see from the PHP community, default features such as this only provide a false sense of security and enable the crappy developer to continue to develop crappy sites. It does not magically

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by Jonathan Holland on 12/20/2007

• Re: UpdateFrom and Encoding

  So if you must have default encoding, what is so hard about default being off, and just having a config section in web.config for it? It seems like the convention over configuration concept is being taken too far, configuration files are not all that bad :)

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by Jonathan Holland on 12/20/2007

• Re: RenderView ToString()

  If you are assembling multiple partial views together in a controller isn't that violating the seperation of concerns between presentation and logic? Personally, I think there should be something like "MasterViews" that contain references to partial views. That way the master view logic can decide how to populate the partial views based upon the data passed to it from the controller.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by Jonathan Holland on 12/20/2007

• Re: UpdateFrom and Encoding

  It absolutely baffles me to think that anyone would encourage default encoding. I know not everyone here has worked in PHP, but that language is a unorganized mess because of features such as "Magic_Escape_Strings" and "strip_Slashes" etc. The lesson learned? Leave the encoding to be done by the developer, not the framework implementation. We are all professionals here right? There is no need for hand holding.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by Jonathan Holland on 12/20/2007

• Re: Route / RouteData /RouteCollection Suggestion (or issue)

  Hi Philip, I am the author of the RouteBuilder HTTPModule, and yes, there was far more code than you would think you would need to do it. Lets hope that v2 cleans that up a lot :)

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by Jonathan Holland on 12/20/2007