You searched for the word(s): userid:776626

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: How to have a URL as part of a route

  [quote user="paul.vencill"] well, again; I would recomment simply *not* using the http:// at all in there. Paul [/quote] I understand what you are saying, but I was trying to make it easy for the end user. If they are browsing a site the address bar will have http://somesite.com/someadditionalstuff and so I just want to say to add the site just put http://mysite.com in front of what is in the address bar. Not take off the http:// and then add http://mysite.com in front of the rest of the

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by mrfleck on 4/15/2009

• Re: How to have a URL as part of a route

  [quote user="CW2"] [quote user="mrfleck"]returns http 400 a bad request[/quote] This is caused by IIS and ASP.NET path validation, which does not allow colon in URLs. Refer to KB articles 826437 and 932552 how to enable/fix that (for 64-bit system the registry key is HKLM\Software\Wow6432Node\Microsoft...). But, you might still have problems with special/reserved characters (//), escaping etc., to workaround such problems you'd probably have to use a custom encoding scheme

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by mrfleck on 4/15/2009

• How to have a URL as part of a route

  I would like to map : http://mysite.com/http://www.amazon.com to a controller and pull out the http://www.amazon.com as a value. Basically I want someone to be able to put my site url in from of a page they are browsing and have a controller intercept it and do something with the page they are passing in. Currently if I put this into route debugger with a catchall it shows as matching the catchall but in practice it just returns http 400 a bad request. Any ideas on how to do this?

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by mrfleck on 4/15/2009

• Re: was the decision to go RC premature?

  I am glad to hear it is nothing mission critical. That is good, it means you hae plenty of time for the final version to show and and any bugs to be worked out. Docs will be better then and you should have a much better experience. The app I put together takes connection strings and sql statements and creates groups in active directory that mimic those queries. It then keeps the groups in sync with the changing data in whatever db the connection strings point to. We have lots of systems of record

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by mrfleck on 2/15/2009

• Re: was the decision to go RC premature?

  From what you write below, I would think you would be an expert by now about how these things go. You say you have the scars to prove it, but scars mean nothing if you don't learn from them. You as the expert should be counseling your customers / boss / etc on the fact that this technology is not even released yet. If you chose to put your eggs in this basket at this time then you really have no one to blame for that but yourself. As you stated below, you should know better. The app I have in

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by mrfleck on 2/15/2009

• Re: was the decision to go RC premature?

  Do you ever have anything positive to say or do you just start negative posts for the fun of it? I have a site in production on the RC internally and another in development. No issues at all. If you don't like being on the bleeding edge, wait until v1 comes out and then wait until the first service pack. We have all seen your posts about documentation and i think those threads have been thrashed to death. We all know how you feel. It just gets old, every post from you is basically the same complaints

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by mrfleck on 2/15/2009

• Re: are you involved with or committed to ASP.NET MVC?

  Have one app running now internally and one slated to go public as soon as v 1.0 comes out and we port and test it.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by mrfleck on 2/10/2009

• Re: Frustration, structure, judgement and giving back

  I for one actually loved the way they did most of this. Give me the bits and give them to me with fast iterations and I am happy. I have the code and so figureing things out has been a snap. I would much rather they spend time on getting the framework feature complete and ready for launch than creating killer docs that will have to drastically change in the iteration process. I am sure now that RC1 is out and feature complete, the samples and documentation will come. MS, PLEASE continue to develop

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by mrfleck on 2/4/2009

• Re: Poll: How many people were affected by the change to use Relative URLs, or the regression in RouteURl?

  Ditto

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by mrfleck on 1/29/2009

• Re: IDataErrorInfo not working with string properties

  Thanks for the info. The problem is I basically want conditional validation. I don't want to validate everytime the property is set or get as that can be a huge waste of resources for me. For instance, I want to validate a connection string property against a db, well I don't want validation to be called for each of those objects if I am reading them out of a db for display. I only want to call the validate function when I am ready to persist. It looks like this won't work for that and

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by mrfleck on 1/29/2009