You searched for the word(s): userid:76662

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: Php performance vs ASP.Net Performance

  ################# *********** I don’t like doing this, but since you included a link to your website and Firesite app, I’ll use this as an example. --------------- But your app illustrates the limitations of any scripting platform (PHP and ASP 3.0). Throughout your files, you have HTML and PHP code mixed. I’m sure you’ve heard the term “spaghetti code”? Your index.php is a good example *********** I'm pretty sure you did like that. However, that particular example is not an example of the scripting

  Posted to Migrating from PHP to ASP.NET (Forum) by ttuttle on 10/21/2003

• Re: Php performance vs ASP.Net Performance

  *********** From what I understand you can bind for example text boxes directly to data in the data source (database). This can be good (seldom) and bad (mostly). *********** You can do this ASP.NET, but it isn’t recommended, nor is it common. I, as MS, recommend using Application Data Blocks for database access. *********** Irrelevant - I can call a method "isValid()" when receiving the input in "one fail swoop". I even lost the dot and the extra prefix... (And yes, I could have

  Posted to Migrating from PHP to ASP.NET (Forum) by ttuttle on 10/14/2003

• Re: Php performance vs ASP.Net Performance

  --------------- "I thought most serious developers separated their presentation layer from the logic. Obviously not in your world. ASP.NET promotes something that over time makes it almost impossible to see any application layers. " --------------- Yes, serious developers do separate their presentation from logic. Be sure you are looking at decent code examples for ASP.NET. You sound like you aren't that familiar with ASP.NET, so be careful of some of the hacked-out ASP.NET examples out

  Posted to Migrating from PHP to ASP.NET (Forum) by ttuttle on 10/10/2003

• Re: Php performance vs ASP.Net Performance

  Note to future posters to this thread: Don't bother asking about ASP.NET here—it’s dead. As you can see from this and other posts in this thread ASP.NET is out-classed in every imaginable category by PHP. Language specifics, web services, security, IDE, performance, it doesn’t matter. PHP is just plain better. Don’t believe me? Just read the previous posts. There is all kinds of evidence. I’m planning to cut all my ASP.NET contracts and start looking for PHP work. Monster.com shows there are 178

  Posted to Migrating from PHP to ASP.NET (Forum) by ttuttle on 1/10/2003

• Re: Php performance vs ASP.Net Performance

  >Come on. That's not what I'm saying at all. First I started >posted here for the "phpfanboy BS" remark - to have some fun. >Secondly I think I'm being pretty specific, without posting >code. Most of what I've said is defence of PHP, i.e. the >opposition to "Attention all PHP developers, stop working in >PHP and start using ASP.NET!". Well, my remarks weren't intended to be personal, so I want to make sure you know that I'm commenting on your argument's integrity

  Posted to Migrating from PHP to ASP.NET (Forum) by ttuttle on 10/21/2002

• Re: Php performance vs ASP.Net Performance

  Attention all ASP.NET developers, stop working in .NET and start using PHP! I'm convinced the successor to sliced bread is here! Let's all join and sing the praises of PHP. Don't have specifics? That's ok. No specifics needed in evangelical propaganda! Just having some fun here... No flames please. >I think you need to replace "True OO languages" with "Fully OO >languages". I'm tiring of the semantical game here. Call it what you want. PHP as a language doesn't compare with

  Posted to Migrating from PHP to ASP.NET (Forum) by ttuttle on 10/18/2002

• Re: Php performance vs ASP.Net Performance

  Harry, you are quite skilled at obfuscation and diversion in your arguments. I mean that as a compliment, especially if you are a politician. Take this example: >Polymorphism is there too right now (no workarounds). 95% of the things >you need workarounds for at the moment are not things you'll ever need >for typical web applications. In other words, you can write a >application in PHP right now which benefits fully from object oriented >design. What PHP won't do at the moment is protect

  Posted to Migrating from PHP to ASP.NET (Forum) by ttuttle on 10/18/2002

• Re: Php performance vs ASP.Net Performance

  >I still say ".NET is compiled" is a misleading statement. What >.NET doesn't do is the "Link" operations that make a truly >stand alone executable (i.e. seperated from the framework), as >with traditional C++. For me it takes what the Java Runtime >does a step further - and perhaps because MS have the >advantage of only having to develop for their own platform. I guess I don’t want to argue semantics. As I mentioned before, .NET is not compiled in the way C

  Posted to Migrating from PHP to ASP.NET (Forum) by ttuttle on 10/16/2002

• Re: Php performance vs ASP.Net Performance

  -- ****************** -- Not quite. ASP.NET (in fact, all .NET languages) is first compiled to IL (intermediate language), which is not quite the same as bytecode. This is what is produced, for example, when you "build" a project in Visual Studio .NET. Unlike bytecode, the IL is then further just-in-time compiled to processor-specific (in most cases, x86) instructions (you can also pre-compile the IL to native code with a utility called ngen.exe, at the cost of some optimizations vs. JIT

  Posted to Migrating from PHP to ASP.NET (Forum) by ttuttle on 10/13/2002

• Re: Php performance vs ASP.Net Performance

  > As the "PHP fanboy" himself thought I'd drop by and say hello ;) > >So as to this: "That article isn't just a "PHP fanboy" / "Pure hate for .NET FW", it's 97% BS!" > >Would you care to be more specific? There are one or two minor mistakes (e.g. calling ASP >a language becuase I'm so used grouping VBScript under the name ASP) which if I could, >I'd correct. But in general, I don't make many claims about either PHP or .NET. So where is

  Posted to Migrating from PHP to ASP.NET (Forum) by ttuttle on 10/12/2002