You searched for the word(s): userid:714253

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: Validation of viewstate MAC failed / The state information is invalid for this page and might be corrupted

  There are apparently quite a few causes of this problem. (I'm glad to see the new setting in .NET 3.5 SP1 to move the hidden fields to the top of the rendered markup. I'm going to log that in the back of my mind for the future.) My teammates and I have been struggling with this error at random since we got new machines and started developing under Vista/IIS7, and I thought I'd restate the solution since none of those that posted for this scenario were very succinct or explanatory (though

  Posted to State Management (Forum) by sliderhouserules on 9/20/2008

• Re: Ajax Won't Work on my Server

  This was our problem: http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2006/12/10/gotcha-don-t-use-xhtmlconformance-mode-legacy-with-asp-net-ajax.aspx

  Posted to ASP.NET AJAX Discussion and Suggestions (Forum) by sliderhouserules on 7/2/2008

• Re: Ajax Won't Work on my Server

  Forgot to say that I have .NET 3.5 installed on the server. When I uninstalled it the page gave an error. When I reinstalled it the page loads fine, but the whole page refreshes when you press the button.

  Posted to ASP.NET AJAX Discussion and Suggestions (Forum) by sliderhouserules on 7/1/2008

• Ajax Won't Work on my Server

  I've created a very basic web app from scratch, a single default page, a couple script tags that output the time, and an update panel with a button. When I access this site on my local machine it works. The page only partially refreshes, the first date value is not changed, and the second date value is changed. When I publish this site to a Win2k3/IIS6 machine it does not work, the whole page refreshes. Any help? Very simple page: < form id= "form1" runat= "server" >

  Posted to ASP.NET AJAX Discussion and Suggestions (Forum) by sliderhouserules on 7/1/2008

• Re: Is ASP.Net MVC ready for production use?

  [quote user="levib"] [quote user="sliderhouserules"]They have said the full release for MVC will be packaged with SP1 for VS2008 and .NET 3.5, and that is slated for late spring 2008. I would look at June for things to come together.[/quote] This is incorrect. There are currently no plans to include MVC as part of SP1. There is also no announced release date for MVC. [/quote]I was going off this , as Scott commented:[quote user="ScottGu"] Hi NGoc, >>>>>

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by sliderhouserules on 3/26/2008

• Re: Is ASP.Net MVC ready for production use?

  They have said the full release for MVC will be packaged with SP1 for VS2008 and .NET 3.5, and that is slated for late spring 2008. I would look at June for things to come together.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by sliderhouserules on 3/25/2008

• Re: Master ViewData and order of operations problem

  It can be a bit confusing because the default master page you get when you create a new MVC project isn't quite the same as the one you get when you add a new MVC Master Page to an existing project.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by sliderhouserules on 3/25/2008

• Re: Master ViewData and order of operations problem

  My second answer after thinking about this for a minute is that you would probably be well served by using some kind of base page for your views. Master Pages are *not* based on inheritance (though they can be, if you wanna play around with it). The Master Page actually gets added to the child control collection of your view page. An alternative to the helper suggestion I made above is to have a base page that does this dynamic work based on the ViewData, and all your pages that have the same type

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by sliderhouserules on 3/24/2008

• Re: Master ViewData and order of operations problem

  I would suggest what you're trying to do doesn't sound like it really belongs in the Master Page. You need your master to do certain things based on the particular view (data) being rendered. This seems the clear responsibility of the view. The MVC Master Page template includes this: < asp:ContentPlaceHolder ID= "head" runat= "server" > </ asp:ContentPlaceHolder > which allows your view page to put anything it wants in the <head>. If you want to make

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by sliderhouserules on 3/24/2008

• Re: Views embedded in assembly?

  I may be misunderstanding what you're really asking for, as I'm not at all familiar with NVelocity, and saying "embed views in an assembly" brings up horrible visions of ISAPI dll's that emit HTML /shudder. But leaving that aside, the first thing that comes to my mind here is you seem to be mixing development with deployment. You can deploy "mixed" web components from multiple assemblies and have them work together all you want. Pages clearly identify what namespace

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by sliderhouserules on 3/20/2008