Search

You searched for the word(s): userid:710863

Matching Posts

  • Re: Best practise for storing DataContext object for use by a static provider

    Thanks Mr Gooding. Yup, I'm quite aware of how to use locks, or at least I think so. A static lock object could be provided by the same static class that provides the static datacontext object, and would have to be used by all methods that access the datacontext object.That means that every method in the static MyMembershipProvider would have to use the lock, and if I were to use the datacontext object down in my pagelevel code, then that code would have to "know" to use the lock object
  • Re: Best practise for storing DataContext object for use by a static provider

    Here's a good discussion of the problem, which has a lot of feedback with links from community: http://blog.codeville.net/2007/11/29/linq-to-sql-the-multi-tier-story/
  • Re: Best practise for storing DataContext object for use by a static provider

    Hi Mr Gooding, just to let you know I edited the above post so it sounds politer (don't want to let any carelessly-written sentences send the wrong message). Looked at your new blog. Keep up the good work :)
  • Re: Best practise for storing DataContext object for use by a static provider

    Here is another more thorough solution to the problem: http://www.ericswann.org/blog/archive/2009/04/06/linq-to-sql-datacontext-provider-revisited.aspx But I don't need the datacontext to be available when HttpContext.Current is null, since I am not upgrading the project to winforms, or running test solutions that don't use it. My project doesn't need to worry about the LoadOptions problems mentioned in http://blog.codeville.net/2007/11/29/linq-to-sql-the-multi-tier-story/ And finally
  • Best practise for storing DataContext object for use by a static provider

    Dear readers, My application uses a static custom membership provider for storing user login identity and information. It uses a LinqToSql object for accessing the MSSQL database. My questions are regarding best practises for instantiating and storing the datacontext object. How and when should it be created? Should the static membership provider have its own datacontext object, or should each static function require a data context as a parameter? There are many possible solutions. My first implementation
  • Re: Keeping a long-running thread alive longer

    oh, I should mention: The threads belong to a custom threadpool which has been declared using the "static" keyword, so the threadpool is NOT destroyed with the pagehandler exits.
    Posted to Architecture (Forum) by bboyle1234 on 7/27/2009
  • Keeping a long-running thread alive longer

    Hi, My application needs to do some lengthy data-update processes at a certain time each day. So I have setup a CRON job on a linux box to call the DataUpdate.aspx page on my website every day at 5pm. It "pokes" the page every five minutes for a couple of hours to make sure the data update gets finished. What usually happens is this: Page is poked from the cron job --> Page sets up some long-running background threads, sends a status message to response and exits --> Background threads
    Posted to Architecture (Forum) by bboyle1234 on 7/26/2009
  • Using IIS7 on the development machine

    Hi, My development machine: Windows XP Home with Visual Studio 2008, Version 9.0.30729.1 SP This week have purchased and setup hosting from mochahost.com. Moving my website from the old hosting to the new, I noticed that the httpHanders defined in web.config had stopped working. In their place, I was getting a 404 (not found) error. After some searching on the net I realised that mochahost was using IIS7 and I had to move my httphandlers from the <system.web><httpHandlers> tag for IIS6
    Posted to Free For All (Forum) by bboyle1234 on 6/26/2009
  • Re: Using IIS7 on the development machine

    Ah thanks Jeff, That would explain the precondition="integratedMode" attributes I see in the handlers defined in the <system.webserver><httpHandlers> section of web.config. I think, since I'm using a shared server, it would be impossible to tell IIS to run in the classic pipeline. But I appreciate the knowledge, and I will put up with the differences until Windows 7 is released... Vista ... ewww.
    Posted to Free For All (Forum) by bboyle1234 on 6/26/2009
  • Re: Alternative to the Aggregate() function when sending a linq query to a database

    Hi Paul, Thank you. Its not too late to normalize. By normalize, did you mean, make the table look like this? Id Values 1 a 1 b 1 c 1 d 2 c 2 d 2 e There is one reason I decided against doing this is the first place. The key, which I conveniently represented here as a single int field, is actually made up of a couple of columns. I didn't want to have those key columns into another table, and then use a foreign key to link them to the values in yet another table, as I figured it would be a heavy
    Posted to C# (Forum) by bboyle1234 on 6/4/2009
Page 1 of 10 (100 items) 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »