You searched for the word(s): userid:68

More Search Options

RSS Available

• IronPython for ASP.NET CTP

  On November 2, 2006 we are releasing "IronPython for ASP.NET" CTP, a package that provides IronPython integration with ASP.NET and Visual Studio (including Visual Web Developer). Please visit http://www.asp.net/ironpython to see the details and to obtain the download link. Please post your questions, comments, suggestions and bug reports to this forum. Thanks, Dmitry

  Posted to IronPython for ASP.NET (Forum) by DmitryR on 10/23/2006
  Filed under: ASP.NET Python IronPython

• Re: Medium Trust with CreateDirectory

  Please try AllAccess or Append. For more info please see http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/cpref/html/frlrfsystemsecuritypermissionsfileiopermissionaccessclasstopic.asp Thanks, Dmitry

  Posted to Security (Forum) by DmitryR on 8/14/2006

• Re: Build Site in VS2005 gives Request for the permission of type System.Web.AspNetHostingPermission...

  To make this work you have to give the UNC share full trust -- please see http://support.microsoft.com/?id=320268 Thanks, Dmitry

  Posted to Security (Forum) by DmitryR on 7/26/2006

• Re: Problems with deployment in a hosted environment

  Jim, The problem is that config APIs read from machine.config (and other parent configs) in addition to your web.config and provide the merged view in the result. Of course, you can read from web.config as XML in medium trust. The bottom line is that in ASP.NET 2.0 the code that is reading ASP.NET config sections is not Medium Trust friendly (or you could say that Medium Trust is not friendly to such code). And that includes the profile viewer control. Thanks, Dmitry

  Posted to Configuration and Deployment (Forum) by DmitryR on 5/5/2006

• Re: Problems with deployment in a hosted environment

  Most ASP.NET sections are not designed to be read by untrusted code -- they are consumed by ASP.NET runtime. I see that the error wasn't very helpful in this case. Sections like <connectionStrings> and <appSettings> (and custom sections defined by the user) can be read by untrusted code. You cannot redefine the meaning of config section at a lower level (it would let untrusted users feed the data into ASP.NET runtime that would not be allowed otherwise). Why do you need to read <profile>

  Posted to Configuration and Deployment (Forum) by DmitryR on 5/5/2006

• Re: Output Cache Profile with a file dependency

  Unfortunately you cannot use <outputCacheProfiles> to specify file dependencies. This (<outputCacheProfiles>) configuration provides a shortcut for defining @outputcache directive on a page. While SqlDepenency is one of the @outputcache settings, file dependencies are not. Please see http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hdxfb6cy.aspx . Thanks, Dmitry

  Posted to State Management (Forum) by DmitryR on 5/4/2006

• Re: Cookies do not persist across pages

  Can you check if the cookie is sent or not from Server C (using something like http://www.fiddlertool.com/ )? Thanks, Dmitry

  Posted to State Management (Forum) by DmitryR on 5/1/2006

• Re: Does PartialCaching ignore Session ID?

  Steve, User conrol cache captures the output as text, so things like post-cache substitution blocks wouldn't work. In general I would strongly recommend against caching anything that includes a session ID, and in this case the recommendation means that you better go with relative links. To make them work from any page (that includes the user conrtol) in your app is not easy, but doable. You could write a redirecting handler, register it as .axd and generate links like this: <a href=" redir.axd

  Posted to State Management (Forum) by DmitryR on 4/30/2006

• Re: Deployment problems...

  The configuration API you are using, WebConfigurationManager.OpenWebConfiguration, is a design-time API that wouldn't work in Medium trust. Please try WebConfigurationManager.GetWebApplicationSection instead. I am not 100% sure, but I believe that's the right one. Thanks, Dmitry

  Posted to Configuration and Deployment (Forum) by DmitryR on 4/25/2006

• Re: Content Expiration

  I don’t know if there is a combination of response headers that would prevent ‘back’ button from working (in all browsers). I suggest closing the browser window instead. Please explain what is the problem you’d like to solve – why is it important to remove ‘back’ funcrionality in the browser? Thanks, Dmitry

  Posted to Security (Forum) by DmitryR on 4/23/2006