You searched for the word(s): userid:665853

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: MVC suggestion for ViewData with anonymous types

  [quote user="tgmdbm"]you've still got to define your interface tho, right? so what's the difference? why not just use a class?[/quote] Lack of multiple inheritance. Here is a poor example. new { Title = "MyTitle", Person = person } : ISiteView, IPersonView new { Title = "MyTitle", Person = person, ShoppingCart = cart } : ISiteView, IPersonView, IShoppingCartAwareView

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by abombss on 3/11/2008

• Re: Preview 2 IControllerFactory

  Show me something in ms mvc that doesn't feel like a hack? Nice work Jeremy on getting everything building in contrib for preview 2.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by abombss on 3/9/2008

• Re: MVC suggestion for ViewData with anonymous types

  Option #2 is something I also wanted in 3.5 on the clr. I think its a huge advantage if an anonymous can implement an interface. This would make using anonymous types outside local scope possible and eliminate the need for actual concrete implementations and crazy things like RouteValueDictionary.... seriously wtf is that thing about. Just something else to get in my way. This stuff is waaaaaaay outside the scope ms mvc. Its part of the clr and language spec. Maybe 4.0, and maybe we can get our readonly

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by abombss on 3/9/2008

• Re: Where did the Route.Validator property go in Preview 2?

  Make sure your parameters are wrapped with { } instead of [ ]. Again view the ReadMe on this one. SimplyRestful uses int, guid, and string regex's and it upgraded fine to preview 2.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by abombss on 3/9/2008

• Re: RESTful HTTP verbs and the httpMethod constraint

  [quote user="nathanlemesurier"]thus all the standard HTTP methods worked and I didn't have to check for POST/_method every time.[/quote] Well if I understand what you did you still are checking everytime because you have a module that checks every post request for _method instead of a custom handler? All you did was move the responsibility to a module instead of inside the handler. This requires extra configuration in web.config which is why in Mvc Contrib we opted for the handler.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by abombss on 3/9/2008

• Re: Where did the Route.Validator property go in Preview 2?

  ReadMe Its called Constraints now.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by abombss on 3/7/2008

• Re: Compile Time Checking of Inline C#

  Go download the Resharper 4.0 Eap http://www.jetbrains.net/confluence/display/ReSharper/ReSharper+4.0+Nightly+Builds

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by abombss on 3/7/2008

• Re: SimplyRestful Routing in Preview 2 Post broke?

  Also... it was breaking on post because the readme forgot to mention that the special "method" parameter was switched to "httpMethod"

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by abombss on 3/6/2008

• Re: SimplyRestful Routing in Preview 2 Post broke?

  There is a branch in mvc contrib subversion called preview2... I just fixed the simply restful stuff there. The core of contrib compiles, but some of the builds for the ViewEngines are failing. But you should be able to checkout my changes or compile just the core if thats all you need. The biggest change was from [] to {} for parameters.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by abombss on 3/6/2008

• Re: SimplyRestful Routing in Preview 2 Post broke?

  I haven't looked at it yet, is mvc contrib building with preview2 yet? If you have a patch post to codeplex and I will take a look at it.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by abombss on 3/6/2008