You searched for the word(s): userid:644412

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: Set a view as E-Mail body

  I know that in earlier versions you could not do this easily with the default view engine because it ignored any stream you tried to pass into it and instead would always grab the httpcontext response stream under the hood to render the view. I haven't tried with the latest versions (this was with one of the earlier ctps) so maybe now you can do this with the webforms view engine. I plan on starting a new project with the new rc and I'll try this out again. Maybe now it will work. If you

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by superevanc on 1/27/2009

• Re: Stateful ASP.NET MVC?

  I like it. I'm not clear on it. It looks like it's the sort of thing I would need to play with. I'm not clear on the LINQ to SQL. Is this a dependency? I've grown to dislike LINQ to SQL a whole bunch after using it on two projects now. How customizable are the Urls? As the MVC team also noted it is easier to work with the webforms aspx page model. I really would love to see innovation moving away from that thing. Maybe even doing away with the compile on the server compilation model

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by superevanc on 7/24/2008

• Re: Unit Testing controller that uses appsettings

  You might want to take a look into using custom configuration sections. I find them easy to use and you end up with a nice object model of your settings that can easily be stubbed.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by superevanc on 6/26/2008

• Re: Why won't ASP.NET MVC replace WebForms (eventually)?

  If by website you don't mean application . People aren't just seriously thinking of doing this they are doing this. Html was designed to mark up documents. It has morphed over time to design application interfaces and with the popularity of ajax has been pushed even further. Frameworks such as silverlight and flex offer a much stronger bedrock for application development and are being heavily considered and starting to get used for applications that require a lot more than what html can deliver

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by superevanc on 6/25/2008

• Re: Why won't ASP.NET MVC replace WebForms (eventually)?

  At the moment my current thinking is that any new light weight web application I develop is going to be done in asp.net mvc or ror. A larger scale web application would probably have me looking at flex or silverlight. I don't see ASP.NET MVC specifically replacing Webforms, I see silverlight and flex solutions replacing Webforms. Actually in the corporate finance world where I work Flex is already replacing Webforms and it is getting done rather quickly with lots of driving forces behind it.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by superevanc on 6/24/2008

• Re: Why won't ASP.NET MVC replace WebForms (eventually)?

  One big advantage that web forms has over asp.net mvc is that it has been used for years now in many companies very successfully. MVC is not yet released. That means a lot in the professional world and rightfully so.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by superevanc on 6/24/2008

• Re: PageLoad in MVC view page

  As long as you are only doing view specific logic I don't see any real problems with it.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by superevanc on 6/18/2008

• Re: Stateful ASP.NET MVC?

  Sounds interesting. I'd like to hear more about it as it comes together.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by superevanc on 6/17/2008

• Re: Evaluating ASP.MVC

  [quote user="GD1"] I'm just starting to look at ASP.MVC for a big project I need to do at work. To be honest, I'm having a hard time finding examples\documentation for this framework that are more complex than a 'Hello World' application or different than the usual Northwind-based app. [/quote] MVC is still in CTP phase so there isn't that much out there about it. In general I've always considered hello world apps a big problem for Microsoft. I've been burned

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by superevanc on 6/16/2008

• Re: Stateful ASP.NET MVC?

  [quote user="nberardi"] You are approaching the ViewState really fast. Which is one thing we were trying to get away from. If you want to use the Routing from the MVC there is a project that maps the routing features to the old ASP.NET Web Forms. [/quote] Not really sure what you are getting at but I disagree that this is approaching the ViewState really fast. Submitting hidden data like this is controlled and lightweight but I believe the big kicker is that it is obvious. There are many

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by superevanc on 6/16/2008