You searched for the word(s): userid:630094

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: MVC On II6 Without the ".mvc" Extension

  [quote user="byron.walker"] I make the same reply about performance as I always do. Show me a profile with a SIGNIFICANT difference in page load times AND that effect the usability of the site and Ill consider a more complex solution to better handle the routing. Otherwise, I like my urls without '.mvc' and so do my customers. Developer cycles are vastly more expensive than CPU cycles. [/quote] I don't think 6 steps and putting in a config file are all that complicated, but

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by cubanx on 1/25/2008

• Re: MVC On II6 Without the ".mvc" Extension

  [quote user="byron.walker"] You do not need this degree of complication. Just add the wildcard mapping as suggested in the initial replies. [/quote] Doing this is bad for performance since all requests get routed through the asp.net ISAPI handler. I can't find the article that I read, but it stated up to a 30% performance improvement. If you're just playing with a MVC, on a dev box or something internal or with low traffic, I think you can get away with this. Note in the link that

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by cubanx on 1/22/2008

• Re: MVC On II6 Without the ".mvc" Extension

  Sorry this took so long to get out to you, but here is a walk through of getting this working: (note, please don't be offended by the bolding, it's for internal devs who don't always read docs well Make sure the .Net 3.5 Framework is installed. Find IsapiRewrite4.dll and IsapiRewrite4.ini at http://cheeso.members.winisp.net/IIRF.aspx Copy the IsapiRewrite4.dll and IsapiRewrite4.ini file to a directory of your choosing on the target web server. We've been using %WINDIR%\system32\inetsrv

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by cubanx on 1/18/2008
  Filed under: MVC, Rewrite URL

• Re: MVC On II6 Without the ".mvc" Extension

  [quote user="mxmissile"] Can someone write a quick walk through to enable this? I know all requests including images, css files etc. will get handled by the Asp.Net engine, but this is for an internal non public facing project. Performance is the least of my concern right now. [/quote] I've done this using the re-writer found here: http://cheeso.members.winisp.net/IIRF.aspx I'm too sleepy right now to do a full walk through, but the two tricks are 1) Get the regex right that rewrites

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by cubanx on 1/7/2008

• Re: On ASP.NET MVC and Extensions Methods

  I think you guys might be overreacting here a little. Rob and other folks working on MVC stuff are not necessarily on the MVC team. So they add extensions methods in hopes that those methods will become "first class" methods. If they do get added into the Mvc namespace proper, there will be zero recoding on our part. If they don't get added, then they're still available as they are today. As any post written at nearly midnight, (although most of my posts fall under this regardless

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by cubanx on 1/7/2008
  Filed under: MVC, Extension methods

• Go Live, licensing, etc for MVC

  Hello, I don't know if there is any kind of license restriction, etc to using the ASP.Net MVC Framework, so I thought I'd ask. We plan to use it for a website that will release in late February or early March. I'm not asking for an official release date I promise But, if I tell you I know I'm taking my website's life into my own hands, and I tell you I've been doing software for a bunch of years and I know the danger of releasing betas into the wild am I ok using the MVC framework

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by cubanx on 12/13/2007
  Filed under: MVC, ASP.NET MVC, CTP, Go Live, License