You searched for the word(s): userid:612559

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: Error loading assembly when Temporary ASP.NET Files path is greater than 260 characters

  Here is one work-around. Relocate the Temporary ASP.NET folder: http://blog.cwa.me.uk/2007/10/15/relocating-temporary-aspnet-files/

  Posted to Web Forms (Forum) by EmperorWal on 4/17/2008

• Re: Error loading assembly when Temporary ASP.NET Files path is greater than 260 characters

  The 260 character limit comes form Win32 APIs. The .NET framework class library developers chose not to work around the MAX_PATH limit in many cases. This is discussed in http://blogs.msdn.com/bclteam/archive/2007/02/13/long-paths-in-net-part-1-of-3-kim-hamilton.aspx .

  Posted to Web Forms (Forum) by EmperorWal on 4/17/2008

• Re: Error loading assembly when Temporary ASP.NET Files path is greater than 260 characters

  http://support.microsoft.com/kb/820129 says the the Http.sys parameter UrlSegmentMaxLength will limit the "Maximum number of characters in a URL path segment (the area between the slashes in the URL)". It does not appear that Http.sys can limit the overall lenght of the Url.

  Posted to Web Forms (Forum) by EmperorWal on 4/16/2008

• Re: Error loading assembly when Temporary ASP.NET Files path is greater than 260 characters

  Hmm. I will test this and let you know. Any advice on how to adjust this on XP/IIS 5.1 (my dev machine)? I didn't think it was Http related becuase the assembly loading is using a local file path (C:\Windows\blah\blah\blah).

  Posted to Web Forms (Forum) by EmperorWal on 4/16/2008

• Error loading assembly when Temporary ASP.NET Files path is greater than 260 characters

  For historical reasons, we have an odd structure to a web application. We have a hierarchical set of nested virtual directories, each has a web.config and is set up as an Application. I’ll simplify and say our file system looks like: C:\inetpub\wwwroot\a\ C:\inetpub\wwwroot\b\ C:\inetpub\wwwroot\c\ C:\inetpub\wwwroot\d\ C:\inetpub\wwwroot\e\ Each of these directories is mapped to a virtual directory so that the application that lives in directory “e” is accessed like: http://localhost/a/b/c/d/e/default

  Posted to Web Forms (Forum) by EmperorWal on 4/16/2008

• Re: Can I use a different database for Membership than Role or Profile?

  Yes, I think you can. But actually, what is even better for me is to simply use a single database with a common ApplicationName for all apps sharing Membership but distinct ApplicationNames for all apps doing Roles or Profiles. You get one row per user in the table aspnet_Membership, but each user who has a role in an application gets a unique row in aspnet_Users for the specified username and the specified application name. This appears to work fine. Any gotchas?

  Posted to Web Parts and Personalization (Forum) by EmperorWal on 3/31/2008

• Can I use a different database for Membership than Role or Profile?

  (Is this the correct forum for questions about ASP.NET 2.0 Membership, Role Manager, and Personalization? If not, please direct me to a better forum) Can I use a different database for Membership than the database I use for Role Management or Profile Management? I have a few applications and I'd like to use a single membership database for user authentication. This way, users will have a single username and password in all of the applications. However, I'd like each application to have its

  Posted to Web Parts and Personalization (Forum) by EmperorWal on 3/31/2008
  Filed under: profiles, roles, Membership, Membership.Providers

• Re: Can the server also send data to the client?

  The key concept in Comet is that the browser makes an Ajax request to the server and the server does not respond right away. The browser and the server both keep this http connection open. Later, when some event occurs on the server, the server can respond to the client request and send it some data. Then the Ajax/Javascript code running on the client can update its display. To the user it seems like a message arrives asyncrhonously from the server, but actually the client made a request and waited

  Posted to ASP.NET AJAX Discussion and Suggestions (Forum) by EmperorWal on 1/10/2007

• Re: Questions about some of the web.config settings.

  Has the generation of the machine keys for DNN been turned into a utility for us to use? or is the code sample in MS KB Q312906 still the best approach? What is the recommended "Best Practice" for MachineKey generation on prodution servers? I assume: 1. Use the technique in MS KB Q312906 and gerate new unique keys. 2. BACKUP AND SAVE YOUR KEYS!!!! 3. Before install of a new production server, modify Web.Config to change the default keys from Release.config to the new unique keys.

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by EmperorWal on 2/13/2006

• Integrated SlickUpload with DNN?

  Has anyone integrated a 3rd party Upload control like SlickUpload ( https://www.assistedsolutions.com/components/SlickUpload/ ) with DNN? I have some modules that I expect to have high volume uploads. I integrated SlickUpload to better handle the load. My problem is that my normal DNN Upload functions in other modules no longer work. I don't want to modify core DNN to use the 3rd party upload module. Has anyone successfully mixed HtmlInputFile with 3rd party upload modules? FYI, most 3rd party upload

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by EmperorWal on 2/11/2006