You searched for the word(s): userid:610312

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: Dedicated server - how to set up?

  Surely a managed dedicated server would be cheaper than the licensing costs of SQL server.

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by Lennon][ on 4/8/2006

• Re: page load error

  Looks like you haven't got the .NET framework installed

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by Lennon][ on 4/3/2006

• Re: javascript:__doPostBack('dnn$ctr421$dnnVISIBILITY$cmdVisibility',")

  Yeah this is a bug, see here: http://forums.asp.net/1115866/ShowPost.aspx A fix is to remove the <dnn:VISIBILITY control from your container file

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by Lennon][ on 3/24/2006

• Re: Why does 100% Css Design Fail in Dnn? (No Tables)

  nokiko wrote: examples i propose here are based on an html skin define the doctype - I would like to be able to set which doctype I want use use for a skin so in my html skin i would have something like <doctype>my doctype here</doctype> - thsi would then be parsed somehow that I know that for this skin the header should have this doctype <headertag>scritps and stuff</headertag> - This would be the same as what we have now as headertag section per page, but it would be much

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by Lennon][ on 3/20/2006

• Re: Why does 100% Css Design Fail in Dnn? (No Tables)

  nbc wrote: So it would be great to get a little group of like minded DNNers together so we can produce real world solutions for the core. Yes, I agree. What do you think of my provider model idea? Can you see any problems with it? Does anyone want to work on a document that can be presented to the Core outlining the provider model? Does anyone have any better ideas?!

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by Lennon][ on 3/20/2006

• Re: Why does 100% Css Design Fail in Dnn? (No Tables)

  The HTTPModule approach does have a slight performance hit yes, but it does avoid having to touch the Core. Isomies solution on the other hand requires Core modifications, but doesn't suffer from any performance hit. The only real solution to the problem is for the Core team to implement the markup produced by the Core (default.aspx and the markup added around each module) as a Provider model. That way, they can implement a default provider which produces the exact code that is produced at the moment

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by Lennon][ on 3/16/2006

• Re: how to enable custom controls in dnn 3?

  That's a setting in XMod, not DNN. Log on as host (default password=host), and then go to your XMod module (if you haven't added one, you need to), and click Administration. The option is there to enable plugins etc.

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by Lennon][ on 3/15/2006

• Re: Why does 100% Css Design Fail in Dnn? (No Tables)

  Nice work. I did the same changes, but I've written an HTTPModule which filters the markup produced by DNN. That way, I don't have to make any changes to the core at all. I was in the process of making a site and making it available, but I stumbled across this thread, and it looks like you've beaten me to it! Hopefully these changes will be made to the Core ASAP.

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by Lennon][ on 3/11/2006

• Re: Retrieve Querystring params from Friendy URL String

  I can't use Request.Querystring because I don't want the parameters of the current page. I have a list of URL's as strings, therefore Request.Querystring is not an option.

  Posted to Core Framework (Forum) by Lennon][ on 2/7/2006

• Retrieve Querystring params from Friendy URL String

  I'll try this again in the right group: Is there any method in the DNN API that can retrieve querystring parameters from a friendly URL string, before I try and write my own? i.e. I have the following string value: /PageName/tabid/243/fredid/6/bertid/12/Default.aspx and I want to get the following as an array of strings: tabid=243 fredid=6 bertid=12

  Posted to Custom Modules (Forum) by Lennon][ on 2/6/2006