Home › ASP.NET Forums › Search

Search

You searched for the word(s): userid:564185

Matching Posts

  • Re: Is there support for non-admins creating pages?

    rodneyjoyce wrote: There is support for this but not in the core. Have a look at the Smart-Thinker HomePage module - each user can create their own page (although you can restrict who can do this by Role) and they can add modules from a pre-defined Admin list. They can change who can see the modules and the containers, layout etc. Is this applicable to non-homepage pages?. I'm specifically interested in certain users/roles being able to create/delete pages (ideally using a specified page as a template
    Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by kunle_X on 10/10/2005

  • Is there support for non-admins creating pages?

    Does DNN support delegating the ability to create pages to non-Admin user roles/users? To be even more specific, I'll like specific non-admin users/roles to be able to create pages (ideally based on an existing page as a template) under a specific menu entry (named "Our Projects" in my case). The user/roles will them be able to customize the page's content by accessing the admin-view of the modules on the page. Is this possible with DNN only?. If not, any robust modules out there?. A full CMS add
    Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by kunle_X on 10/10/2005

  • Re: Solpartmenu positioning bug in XHTML page when using FireFox

    mtaggart wrote: I've been trying to develop a standards compliant xhtml/css DNN site that will validate through the W3C. I've noticed that whenever I use a DOCTYPE other than the basic HTML Transistional, like if I try to use any XHTML DocTypes, ie. - <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> < html xmlns = "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang = "en" > the Solpartmenu positioning gets all jacked up in FireFox. It positions
    Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by kunle_X on 8/23/2005

  • Re: Upgrade 3.0.13 to 3.1.1 Question

    disker wrote: I have a running install of 3.0.13 and plan to upgrade to 3.1.1 this week. Can I skip 3.1 and move to 3.1.1 or should I load 3.1 first and then move up? Also, do I have to manually change the web.config or will this happen on it's own in 3.1.1? I'm a little unfamiliar with making changes to the web.config beyond adding my connection string server info. Yes, I did that just yesterday. You should download 3.1.0 too as it contains an installation guide that explains the changes that needs
    Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by kunle_X on 8/23/2005

  • Re: Firebird Provider

    ArturAnjos wrote: Just be aware that using the Embedded server, the database is locked by the aplication that it's using it. This could create some kind of problems to backup the database by some tool outside of your aplication. But if DotNetNuke can provide the way to backup, the problem is solved. Have you used Firebird in embedded mode with a busy/very-busy web application?. I'm really intrigued about the possibility of that mode of usage but can't help feeling that it won't scale since the database
    Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by kunle_X on 8/23/2005

  • Re: DNN 3.1.1 Congrats, Performance Notes, and Forum Intervention

    jbrinkman wrote: kunle_X wrote: christoc wrote: behold the power of the moderators! And the abuse of it as I clearly stated. When I get a new puppy, he is left in a little puppy carrier whenever I leave the house until he learns to behave himself and not pee on the floor when I leave. Once the puppy shows a basic learning of that skill then he is given more freedom. Some puppies never learn, others catch on real quick. Just like puppies, it is your choice as to which group you want to be placed.
    Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by kunle_X on 8/23/2005

  • Re: DNN 3.1.1 Congrats, Performance Notes, and Forum Intervention

    tmorton wrote: kunle_X wrote: To, whomever is moderating this, have a look at my pm's to bhopkins Moderators do not have the ability to read other people's PMs. I wasn't aware of that. Thanks for the heads up, Terri. I asked for the removal of the comment " If I see you know who whining any more about nightly builds I will have be moderated. " in the first post in this removed after my reply to it was cancelled. I'd still like it removed (or that I be allowed to reply to it). Thanks.
    Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by kunle_X on 8/23/2005

  • Re: The DNN site has a new skin

    Thanks Geert and Darren. And nikoko... ;-)
    Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by kunle_X on 8/23/2005

  • Re: The DNN site has a new skin

    lou wrote: I just noticed that www.dotnetnuke.com has a modified version of the skinergy skin. Is this skinergy skin [supposed to be] included in 3.1.1?. Couldn't find it...
    Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by kunle_X on 8/23/2005

  • Re: Tableless skins, CSS, XHTML and DNN 3.x

    Thanks, nokiko. Will look into this. Already built my own menu server controls, just finishing off the skinobjects. Will probably go the module way. Cheers!
    Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by kunle_X on 8/23/2005
Page 1 of 7 (67 items) 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »

Contact | Advertise | Ads by BanManPro | Running IIS7
All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use | Trademarks | Privacy Statement
© 2009 Microsoft Corporation.