You searched for the word(s): userid:48404

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: Php performance vs ASP.Net Performance

  Back again ;) Just picking up a couple of points; "ASP.NET is ... significantly ahead of Java/J2EE" Think you'll have to justify that. RMI/EJB (compared to SOAP web services) is a significantly more mature (albeit J2EE only) mechanism for communication between application tiers. Java also has a range of supporting projects which dwarfs .NET, such as the ground breaking and highly respected struts framework . IDE-wise, if you know Java you might be pleasantly surpised by Eclipse (free!)

  Posted to Migrating from PHP to ASP.NET (Forum) by HarryF on 1/9/2003

• Re: Php performance vs ASP.Net Performance

  Just sticking with PHP and OO; About the PHP polymorphism I'm not sure that's really polymorphism. How do you call the base classes member that was over written (i.e., the function that would be labeled "virtual" in C++)? Generally it's unnecessary, but it's still part of being polymorphic (otherwise it's just morphism/morphic :)) I was demonstrating the kind of workaround you need in PHP (right now) if you want protect a method - the abstract class UserInterface shouldn't be directly accessed

  Posted to Migrating from PHP to ASP.NET (Forum) by HarryF on 10/22/2002

• Re: Php performance vs ASP.Net Performance

  Attention all ASP.NET developers, stop working in .NET and start using PHP! I'm convinced the successor to sliced bread is here! Let's all join and sing the praises of PHP. Don't have specifics? That's ok. No specifics needed in evangelical propaganda! Come on. That's not what I'm saying at all. First I started posted here for the "phpfanboy BS" remark - to have some fun. Secondly I think I'm being pretty specific, without posting code. Most of what I've said is defence of PHP, i.e. the

  Posted to Migrating from PHP to ASP.NET (Forum) by HarryF on 10/20/2002

• Re: Php performance vs ASP.Net Performance

  First going back to an earlier point PHP coming ability to delete objects. The examples given by Chris assume you know the objects reference. With the new engine, my understanding is you'll be able to get an object to delete itself or in cases where you're using a factory method or an interface for example, and don't what objects have been created, you can still delete them. PHP will also have a destructor as well as the constructor is already has, so you can can be sure an object will die the moment

  Posted to Migrating from PHP to ASP.NET (Forum) by HarryF on 10/18/2002

• Re: Php performance vs ASP.Net Performance

  It doesn't matter if what it does is misleading and that a separate EXE is not created, it makes a pass into IL and then machine code. Machine code == compiled. Which goes back to my origional point that PHP's Zend Accelerator or the free alternative PHP Accelerator do the same thing and have been doing so for a while now. In their product literature they call "compiling" things like "advanced caching". So when an .NET coder tells me ".NET = compiled therefore faster than

  Posted to Migrating from PHP to ASP.NET (Forum) by HarryF on 10/17/2002

• Re: PhP on windows platform

  If you want a very easy life, try one of these installers; http://www.firepages.com.au/phpdev5.htm or http://phphome.sourceforge.net They both install PHP, Apache and MySQL (plus the web gui tool for MySQL - phpMyAdmin). You'll be up and running in no time at all.

  Posted to Migrating from PHP to ASP.NET (Forum) by HarryF on 10/17/2002

• Re: Php performance vs ASP.Net Performance

  A further answer is on it's way to the many responses (short on time right now). First of all, the article was intended to be biased and provoke discussion. It was specifically addressing a few remarks made in various PHP vs. .NET discussions on Sitepointforums (most fairly non technical) and the "10 Myths" were aimed to address woolly "facts" being made as to why .NET is better. I still say ".NET is compiled" is a misleading statement. What .NET doesn't do is the "Link"

  Posted to Migrating from PHP to ASP.NET (Forum) by HarryF on 10/15/2002

• Re: Php performance vs ASP.Net Performance

  As the "PHP fanboy" himself thought I'd drop by and say hello ;) So as to this: "That article isn't just a "PHP fanboy" / "Pure hate for .NET FW", it's 97% BS!" Would you care to be more specific? There are one or two minor mistakes (e.g. calling ASP a language becuase I'm so used grouping VBScript under the name ASP) which if I could, I'd correct. But in general, I don't make many claims about either PHP or .NET. So where is the BS? If you liked the comments

  Posted to Migrating from PHP to ASP.NET (Forum) by HarryF on 10/12/2002