You searched for the word(s): userid:474909

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: Content aware server transfer

  Whatever. Your tone sounds real lousy and I don't know why. Of course this is possible is some shape or form without status codes. A characteristic of any distributed system is location transparency. We can always write software into the IIS pipeline to accomplish this. I thought I'd do some research if others have done this or there was a built in way with in IIS. We can use Windows Load Balancing at the server level to transfer requests based on the content. I was looking for a way to basically

  Posted to HttpHandlers and HttpModules (Forum) by stephenzr on 3/10/2008

• Content aware server transfer

  I'm looking for some insight into performing a TCP Hand-off via IIS/ASP.NET. We have a large amount of content (aspx, asp pages, css, etc generated by a design team) that we want to start serving from only a subset of our farm. I'm looking for a way to ease this transfer. The content is always under either virtual directory A or B, so it's easy to tell if the content should be served from application servers or content servers. What I would like to do is use either am http module or http

  Posted to HttpHandlers and HttpModules (Forum) by stephenzr on 3/3/2008

• Automate SSL cert installation

  We have built a tool that will use WMI to create our IIS website any on hardware configuration. So we can spin up a site now very fast, or tear down and old config and rebuild. The only thing that is slowing us down is installing out SLL certificates. I've tried the SSL vbs script from the IIS resource kit, but that acts flaky. We create three sites and a time, and after the second SSL installation the first site stops working. Always. Does anyone know how to install these certificates programatically

  Posted to Web Hosting with IIS and ASP.NET (Forum) by stephenzr on 1/30/2008
  Filed under: iis, SSL

• Re: How to complete a 'long processing task' even if server reboots

  So don't use MSMQ then. Use another queueing product. Though, there are of course ways for other types of clients to PUT and GET from a Microsoft Queue. Stephen

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by stephenzr on 1/9/2008

• Re: Compiling DAL and BLL into separate DLLs

  I think I hear what you're saying. The only place we are at an impass is that you've restated now that the n-tier architecture you've mentioned is the correct way. My friend, that feels like an absolutist statement. This form of N-Tier, also hiding MVC, is not the only architecture and certainly not always the "correct" way. Stephen R.

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by stephenzr on 1/7/2008

• Re: Compiling DAL and BLL into separate DLLs

  naturehermit, again, we're back to dogma. Do you remember what was trying to be accomplished by the starter of this thread? All of these layers, and the myriad of interfaces between them are not *always* necesary. I've seen times (work in one now) where it is. I've seen times where it definitely wasn't. So, if it's not needed all the time, why would it be correct all of the time? And therefore, being not always correct, why would it always be the goal? What about ORM? Linq, NHibernate

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by stephenzr on 1/6/2008

• Re: Compiling DAL and BLL into separate DLLs

  Hey Star, I hear what you're saying and I used to believe that whole heartedly. I think I've become a little more practical over the years, or stringent. Sometimes I can' tell. [quote user="naturehermit"]So in your BL you can calculate stuff in a different way [/quote] It's very rare that I've seen a new BL put on top of a DAL. If you need change behavior, you can extend classes in the BL, override methods, etc. And the PL can always use whatever BL so it doesn't

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by stephenzr on 1/6/2008

• Re: Session Performance with Custom Classes

  You're requirements are so minimum that it doesn't really matter what kind of object or serialization technique you use. Processors in webservers won't even flinch. So just do whatever pleases you and seems appropriate. Custom objects to give your brain and fingers some work, or using a datatable to simply things a bit. Good luck. Stephen R.

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by stephenzr on 1/5/2008

• Re: Session Performance with Custom Classes

  What I'm trying to get at, is that it depends on the intended usage of the application? Will you have 1 server? Twenty? 100 simultaneuous users or 1000?

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by stephenzr on 1/4/2008

• Re: Compiling DAL and BLL into separate DLLs

  You're not alone. :) Stephen R.

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by stephenzr on 1/4/2008