You searched for the word(s): userid:4295

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: need help converting an operator

  Look at this simple VB.Net console app: imports Microsoft.VisualBasic imports System imports System.Collections public module MyModule sub Main Dim ConcatString as string = 5 & 6 Dim AddString as string = 5 + 6 Console.WriteLine( "Concat: " & ConcatString) Console.WriteLine( "Add: " & AddString) Console.ReadLine() end sub end module If option strict is off then the output will be: Concat: 56 Add: 11 In the Concat example, the literals are coerced to strings and then

  Posted to C# (Forum) by jbrinkman on 9/6/2006

• Re: need help converting an operator

  &= is a string concatenator and is the same as var = var & somestring. In C# this would be var += somestring;

  Posted to C# (Forum) by jbrinkman on 9/6/2006

• Re: Performance difference between performing work in memory or through database calls?

  In general, you should try to minimize db calls. These are very expensive, so anything you can do to reduce calls can greatly improve performance. However this does not necessarily require the processing to occur in the business layer. Also, like any question of performance, you should test both alternatives with some representative data to determine the best approach for your specific case. Just remember to perform the tests under load so that you can ensure that your final solution will still perform

  Posted to Architecture (Forum) by jbrinkman on 8/24/2006

• Re: DNN 3.3.2 , SQLExpress SP1, case sensitive

  This is a known problem and one that is on the list we are considering for the roadmap. It affects all versions of DNN and is not limited to SQLExpress.

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by jbrinkman on 7/8/2006

• Re: about scheduler

  DNN is subject to the same restriction. The best way to overcome it is to use a keepalive service. Many standard web monitoring services, which are used to check if a site is working, will also have the effect of keeping the site from recycling as long as you can configure the web monitor to "view" the default.aspx page.

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by jbrinkman on 7/3/2006

• Re: The next DotNetNuke book(s) - when?

  alwysbrke is correct. We finished writing back in February/March which means several features in 4.3 were still under development and incomplete, and therefore they could not be discussed in the book. The main area affected by this is in the area of user management, since much of 4.3 is devoted to an overhaul of the underlying membership/profile system. I can say however that were able to add a good bit of updated and expanded coverage over the previous edition. (approximately 100 new pages information

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by jbrinkman on 6/26/2006

• Re: The next DotNetNuke book(s) - when?

  We just received an email from the publisher tonight and the book should be shipping to Amazon et al the first week of July, which means people with pre-orders should start receiving their copies by the second week of July or thereabouts.

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by jbrinkman on 6/25/2006

• Re: Your thoughts on recent blog..

  brian_c: approx 300k registered users Congrats but I find general statistics boring and misleading.. not downplaying the numbers but I'd find more interest in unique visitors to the dotnetnuke.com website on a montly basis.. Try visiting DotNetNuke.com homepage where you can see between 3 and 5 hundred new registrations per day. There are also a number of other numbers that can be derived by looking at the history of the project. The point is not to argue over whether the real number is 300k or 275k

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by jbrinkman on 6/16/2006

• Re: Your thoughts on recent blog..

  Actually, Brian, the premise of your post is flat wrong. We do not implement features solely because someone pays for it. We implement features that, as managers of the project, we feel are important for the community. Sometimes, it is because large parts of the community have asked for the feature, sometimes it is because, as the people with inside knowledge, we know what framework infrastructure we will need to attract a larger market or to support some future feature which was requested by the

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by jbrinkman on 6/16/2006

• Re: Enbedding aspx page into another aspx page and post back

  I would use a different approach. I would either: 1) Make A a masterpage and have B, C, and D use that masterpage or 2) Make B, C, D into User Controls and dynamically load the appropriate control based on the URL. This is likely to require you to use a URL rewriter if you want to hide the fact that B, C and D are not true "pages".

  Posted to Web Forms (Forum) by jbrinkman on 6/6/2006