You searched for the word(s): userid:4293

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: MVC Not Installed with VS 2010 Beta 2?

  With Jacques' help offline (I had to send him some log files), the problem is now solved. I want to post the resolution in case anyone else faces the same problem. The problem had something to do with the failure to register the MVC templates, done using devenv.exe /installvstemplates, which registers project and item templates. This was being manifested in the installation logs with these items, which Jacques dug out: (SERVER) MSI (s) (14:08) [10:51:02:619]: Note: 1: 1722 2: VisualStudio_VSSetup

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by donkiely on 11/13/2009

• MVC Not Installed with VS 2010 Beta 2?

  By all accounts that I've read, Visual Studio 2010 Beta 2 has MVC Preview 2 included. But it is not included in the list of Web project templates in either VB or C# in my installation. There was an error installing MVC when I first installed Beta 2 on this Vista machine, but I re-ran setup and repaired/reinstalled, which executed successfully. Still, no MVC project templates. Does anyone know how I can fix this installation to be able to use MVC in VS 2010? Thanks, Don

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by donkiely on 11/12/2009

• Re: MVC Not Installed with VS 2010 Beta 2?

  Hi Jacques, The error was "Microsoft ASP.NET MVC 2 - Visual Studio 2010 Tools: [2] WARNING! Setup Failed for optional component Microsoft ASP.NET MVC 2 - Visual Studio 2010 Tools. MSI returned error code 1603." Various Google searches on that didn't lead me to anything useful. ARP? What is that? (Sorry if I'm being dense.) MVC isn't listed in the About box, but I don't know if it would be. Maybe you mean Programs and Features in the Vista Control Panel? (Add/Remove Programs

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by donkiely on 11/12/2009

• Re: Is it possible to learn ASP.Net without C# or VB knowledge?

  Hi Sako, In theory, yes, you could learn ASP.NET without knowing one of the languages. There are a lot of features reasonably implemented for which you can use drag and drop, then set properties. Microsoft keeps expanding such features with each new version of ASP.NET. But in reallity you'd be severely limited. It is pretty rare that a feature does exactly what you need, and the way to extend it is through code. Without code, your Web sites won't be very robust. Even Dynamic Data sites require

  Posted to Getting Started (Forum) by donkiely on 10/25/2009

• Re: Is it possible to learn ASP.Net without C# or VB knowledge?

  Hi Sako, Most people consider VB to be easier to learn, and if you're familiar with VBA you'll feel right at home with the syntax. A lot is different, but the overall look and feel is very similar to VBA. It is hard to answer how long it will take. It depands on how motivated you are, how much time you spend at it, and how much you write code to get good at it. In a couple of days you could be writing some simple code, maybe enough to make a Web page reasonably functional. In a week or two

  Posted to Getting Started (Forum) by donkiely on 10/25/2009

• Re: The old "That assembly does not allow partially trusted callers." problem

  Yes it does. Okay, so far so good. You have a custom assembly that has the APTC attribute. This means that the exception is not originating from your custom assembly. Assuming, that is, that you don't make any demands in that assembly for full trust. Do you? I'm guessing you're not, which means that the error is probably coming from an assembly that your custom assembly calls, probably in the .NET Framework. Can you post the full exception that you get, including the stack trace? That

  Posted to Security (Forum) by donkiely on 9/20/2009

• Re: corrupted .cs file

  Well, only if you have a backup of the file. Do you? Do you use source control? If so, it will be there, or at least from when you updated it last. And like I said, if you have an assembly with the code, you can use .NET Reflector to extract the code. But if there are other code files compiled into it, it will take a bit of work to do. Unless, of course, you obfuscated it. Don

  Posted to Web Forms (Forum) by donkiely on 9/20/2009

• Re: corrupted .cs file

  Is it a file you created and wrote the code in? If so, you could use the free .NET Reflector to get the source code back. Or do you mean that it was one of the auto-generated files that Visual Studio creates? If so, which one? Don

  Posted to Web Forms (Forum) by donkiely on 9/19/2009

• Re: The old "That assembly does not allow partially trusted callers." problem

  Well, the answers are buried around here, but it boils down to, you can't. Maybe. Let's see if we can figure out a way to make this work. First, what assembly are you trying to call? The one that requires full trust, that is. There maybe something specific about that assembly that could be the solution. Is the assembly you're calling an assembly that you control? That is, you have the source code to? I assume so, since you added the AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers attribute to it. Or do

  Posted to Security (Forum) by donkiely on 9/19/2009

• Re: Stored Procedure vs. Direct Sql access. - Which is better? Understanding both.

  [quote user="SubsonicRecordPool"]as i understand both do the exact same thing, BUT the SP is a more secure method.[/quote] They do the exact same thing in terms of executing a SQL statement. But how they go about it is quite different. Among other things, when executing dynamic SQL you have to pass the entire SQL statement over the network rather than just a short procedure name. And SQL Server can optimize stored procedures more readily. [quote user="SubsonicRecordPool"]So, if

  Posted to Security (Forum) by donkiely on 9/14/2009