You searched for the word(s): userid:328346

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: DNN Conference

  Or Vancouver, BC (home of the 2010 Winter Olympics)?

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by cnurse on 3/30/2006

• Re: Upcoming Changes in Membership Components

  They will be in both

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by cnurse on 3/22/2006

• Upcoming Changes in Membership Components

  For those of you who have been paying attention to the RoadMap on Dotnetnuke.com, you will be aware that there are some significant changes to the Membership/Roles/Profile components of DNN under development. This post is a heads-up summary of what is proposed. Abstraction of Membership/Roles/Profile to a provider model, including abstract providers for each component and a default concrete provider that implements the MS MemberRole functionality Enhancments to Membership components that include

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by cnurse on 3/22/2006

• Re: Need to Write Membership Provider for DNN 4

  Sorry - I wasn't clear. What I meant was that the abstract provider(s) provide the API and developers call them using provider.Instance() which will in turn instantiate the correct concrete implementation, BUT that developers do not need to know what that implementation does. ie they code to the abstract API. With regard to microsoft membership provider model - we are following the design pattern completely. The difference being that we have added a further layer of abstraction. The AspNet concrete

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by cnurse on 3/3/2006

• Re: Need to Write Membership Provider for DNN 4

  The membership capabilities of the next version (both 3.3 and 4.1), will be enhanced in a number ways. The biggest is that we will have 3 abstract providers: MembershipProvider RolesProvider ProfileProvider ALL References to ASP.NET membership components will be removed from the core, and calls will be made to these abstract providers instead. We will be providing a concrete implementation using MemberRole etc. This will allow developers to write concrete providers that target directly other membership

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by cnurse on 3/2/2006

• Re: 3.2 vs 4.0

  smehaffie wrote: DNN 4.0 is basically the same code as 3.2, only changes made were to get it so it would compile in .Net 2.0 and work with the built in membership provider instead of the "back ported one" that was used in 3.1. I will see if the main person to work on the porting of DNN to 2.0 can post the types of things that were changed to port it over. I plan on updating my sites soon, I have just been to busy to do it. Exactly - while we have had a few quirks with DNN 4 - this is mainly due to

  Posted to Core Framework (Forum) by cnurse on 1/27/2006

• Re: Strategic move to DNN

  zmariow wrote: 1. How can I build my modules in such a way that I can update the DNN core without changing my modules code? 2. How can I have custom user attributes? Allow admins to set what user attributes are needed per portal? (I've found some modules to do this, but as a beginner in DNN I'm unable to tell wich ones are best) 3. To what extent are portals separate? I want them to be TOTALLY separate and I want the end users and admins of every portal to know zero information about other portals

  Posted to Getting Started (Forum) by cnurse on 1/25/2006

• Re: How to reference depreciated and new CORE methods (best practice question)

  The SMTP mail objects and methods were significantly changed in .NET 2 - the old ones are still there for backwards compatibility, but it was our approach (to avoid syntax warnings in core code) to convert to use these new methods whereever we could. If you look at the section of Globals where the SendNotification methods are located there is a comment block. 'These functions have been replaced by the Mail class in 'DotNetNuke.Services.Mail. They have been retained here 'for backwards compatabily

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by cnurse on 12/9/2005

• Re: DNN 4.0.1 and 3.2.1 Released

  M.G.G. wrote: <httpRuntime useFullyQualifiedRedirectUrl="true" maxRequestLength="8192" requestLengthDiskThreshold="8192" /> It has been fixed in 4.0.1, just overlooked in 3.2.1 - its only a bug in .NET2 though.

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by cnurse on 12/8/2005

• Re: HTML Text area module - can't link to document

  This also depends on the editor you use. If you use CuteEdit or Rad Editor they have options to insert a link to a DNN page. However, the free FTB (FreeTextBox) version just provides an insert link dialog. As FTB is extensibl we are considering adding some extra capabilities found in some of the commerical editors.

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by cnurse on 12/5/2005