You searched for the word(s): userid:317531

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: Comparison: Cold Fusion vs. ASP.NET

  Quote: The CF code here is not explicit enough to allow the compiler to run fast enough. It has to spend all of the time going through looking for the tags, looking for the # and rendering data when it is done. I will put pre-compiled C# code up to that any day. Reply: Coldfusion code nowadays is compiled code that is cached for subsequent hits. This used to go like this: Coldfusion code -> Java code -> Java bytecode. And with the new Coldfusion MX 6.1 it's like: Coldfusion Code -> Java

  Posted to Migrating from Cold Fusion to ASP.NET (Forum) by ToAoM on 10/15/2003

• Re: Comparison: Cold Fusion vs. ASP.NET

  As for the commenting Coldfusion style. You can always hit: <cfscript> var variables.var1 // Variable 1 </cfscript> You can include as much declarations in that block as you'd wish. Also, when using Coldfusion Components (CFC) you have the commenting attributes on the cffunction tags which will auto generate a commented version of your component when viewed with the component viewer. I agree that most of these changes are only available to Coldfusion MX and above, but the same applies

  Posted to Migrating from Cold Fusion to ASP.NET (Forum) by ToAoM on 10/15/2003

• Re: Comparison: Cold Fusion vs. ASP.NET

  I've been using both Coldfusion MX and ASP.net along side eachother for the past year and a half. Coldfusion performance used to be below par with most ASP.net pages except for the first call. But with the new Coldfusion MX 6.1 version there have been a lot of improvemenst performencewise and Coldfusion is now usually just as fast as ASP.net in similar situations. Especially the first hit on any page is now much faster in Coldfusion than it is in ASP.net on the same server. This is especially nice

  Posted to Migrating from Cold Fusion to ASP.NET (Forum) by ToAoM on 10/15/2003

• Re: Migrating from ColdFusion to ASP.NET

  The things that are great for ASP.net are: * a fully working editor with great debugger support (dreamweaver can do some debugging, but it's lacking, Coldfusion Studio/Homesite+ is a lot better with debugging, but it has no visual editing facility * once you know either VB.net or C# you can apply your knowlege in other places but just ASP.net * Separation of logic and presentation (can also be done in coldfusion using the new CFC's which have recently ahd a great improvement). * It's easier to use

  Posted to Migrating from Cold Fusion to ASP.NET (Forum) by ToAoM on 10/15/2003

• Re: Decrypting passwords encrypted using Cold Fusion Encrypt

  Encryption in Coldfusion uses DES with a user specified seed. I'm not sure if it also Xors every bit with it's position, at least that is used in some other routines within coldfusion.

  Posted to Migrating from Cold Fusion to ASP.NET (Forum) by ToAoM on 10/15/2003