You searched for the word(s): userid:230106

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: Caught in System.AccessViolationException when trying to use iFilters in asp.net 2.0

  Yes. In fact I have several test setups and all are displaying this behavior now. The Win2003/IIS6 installation, and also the Vista/IIS7 installation. Both running full trust.

  Posted to Enterprise Services Integration (Forum) by donker on 12/20/2007

• Re: Caught in System.AccessViolationException when trying to use iFilters in asp.net 2.0

  Nope. I tried but in the end I don't think it's a threading issue. AFAIK the threading issue cropped up on the PDF iFilter due to its design. I'm having this issue with Office filters, i.e. the one that should always work.

  Posted to Enterprise Services Integration (Forum) by donker on 12/19/2007

• Caught in System.AccessViolationException when trying to use iFilters in asp.net 2.0

  This seemed to work fine until a couple of Months ago. I use an adaptation of the iFilter solution by Eyal Post: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/IFilter.aspx . The iFilter dll gets identified correctly and gets loaded. The problem comes when the reader actually tries to read. Boom, error System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. I've spent hours scouring the net on this and the impression I have is

  Posted to Enterprise Services Integration (Forum) by donker on 12/19/2007
  Filed under: ifilter AccessViolationException

• Re: RTM: Could not load file or assembly 'System.Web.Extensions' or one of its dependencies

  I'm sorry if I sounded sarcastic, but I was really under the impression that this was maybe not entirely ready to fly. My fear is that if I can't get it to work quickly, my clients will never get there. So when I struggle through various (un)installs and feel I really followed all the directions, I'm obivously overlooking something and so will they. As it turned out it was in the web.config (I installed the toolkit and saw that it ran without the dll in the bin directory so I knew it had to work

  Posted to ASP.NET AJAX Discussion and Suggestions (Forum) by donker on 1/26/2007

• RTM: Could not load file or assembly 'System.Web.Extensions' or one of its dependencies

  I just can't get it to install. I've gone through the procedure 100 times by now, but no luck. FYI I need to run the extensions from the GAC so there is no System.Web.Extensions.dll in the bin directory. - I have double-clicked (as Admin) many times the ASPAJAXExtSetup.msi and gone through setup (and uninstalled and reinstalled etc) - I have verified the existence of the dll in the GAC by (1) seeing it on the 'add reference' box in VS and (2) seeing it in Windows\Assemby - I have copied the 3million

  Posted to ASP.NET AJAX Discussion and Suggestions (Forum) by donker on 1/26/2007

• Re: PHP equivalent to DNN

  Hi Greg, Why on earth would you compromise? Just give the client the clear choice: it's either a good solution with you in the driver's seat, or he can drive himself. My 2cts, Peter PS Sorry for not having a good alternative for you ...

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by donker on 7/3/2006

• Module scope and the design of DNN

  Module scope variations I have the following issue I’d like to bring up for discussion: currently DNN is designed to handle modules that have a ‘module-wide’ scope of operation which is too limited for more complex applications. Let me explain. Module scope A module stores its data typically with a ModuleID in the column of the principal table. You can verify this in most core modules, but let’s take Announcements as an example. So every announcement stored is tied to the instance of the announcement

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by donker on 6/25/2006

• Re: ASP.NET “Atlas”

  I know Jon's been working hard on implementing Ajax in the core but even he would agree the solution is not for the feintharted. Having to deal with wiring events with Javascript that needs to e emitted to a page etc etc is really a fine art. On top of this: debugging a solution that uses js and events in your code behind is practicably next to impossible. The Atlas project uses a DLL that takes care of all the js and wiring for you. This makes the whole solution (1) less error prone, and (2) easier

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by donker on 6/25/2006

• Re: Which forum do you like better?

  Aaaaahhhh ... now that's alot better. Smart stuff this DNN ;-)

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by donker on 6/24/2006

• Re: Which forum do you like better?

  I can't really see why so many subforums had to be created on dnn. As a result I don't know where to post or look for answers. So I skip it. Second point: the fixed width skin of DNN. I am blessed with a 1680x1050 screen and can still only get about 300 pixels width for a posting on the DNN forums. That is very annyoing (and ugly ...). What is annoying about ASP is that the screen goes grey for a while before the content is shown. And this happens on e-v-e-r-y click. If the connection is slow (which

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by donker on 6/23/2006