You searched for the word(s): userid:138049

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Re: Multi-Tenant Aspect (How to?)

  I have done something like that, by creating an ActionFilter which runs globally. the Filter does a lookup of the URL host string and then adds a Site object to the routedata collection. Alternatively you could inject the site as a parameter on all of your controller methods. Look at the Oxite code base as it has a filter repository implementation that allows you to hook up filters that you can run globally without having to specify them on each and every class. I've been meaning to write something

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by sodablue on 4/15/2009

• Re: MVC RC Version

  [quote user="levib"] The RC is still targeted for January. [/quote] Which year? :-)

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by sodablue on 1/19/2009

• Re: ASP.NET MVC -Architecture direction and guidance

  [quote user="jtbs"] - What are primary goals for ASP.NET MVC [Don't tell me layer separation and testing[/quote] To not suck like web forms. :-) Seriously, if you want to try out ajax try a quick sample using a controller method returning a JSONResult, along with jquery. Now do a search on the internet for something cool in ajax and jquery, look at the example. It probably is written for PHP or maybe Java. Now think about how you'd do it in web forms, versus ASP.NET MVC. Web forms

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by sodablue on 1/14/2009

• Re: ActionLink ... What am I doing wrong?

  On Line 2... you have fc.CustomLis??? You're missing a t Yeah, the error message makes no sense.

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by sodablue on 9/25/2008

• Re: Prevent URL Tampering

  Why don't you want the user to be able to save a favorite?

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by sodablue on 8/8/2008

• Re: MVC on CrystalTech?

  Yes, it works fine. I had to make sure my developer account was on a Windows 2008 server with ASP.NET 3.5. Then, you need to mark the references to three ASP.NET MVC DLLs as 'copy local' and deploy them into your bin folder. I haven't updated to the latest drop, but it worked great with the MIX CTP. What sort of issues are you seeing?

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by sodablue on 4/27/2008

• Re: Weird URL issues with RouteData

  I suspect you have another route that is getting used. It has to do with the order. If you have the default "{controller}/{action}/{id}" first in your list, it doesn't matter what you have later as that will probably be used. Also, there seems to be a general problem when you have more than one variable. If you just have {id}, everything works pretty well. But I had something similar "group/{groupname}/{action}/{id}" where groupname was required, action defaulted to "Index"

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by sodablue on 4/9/2008

• Re: Code Blocks vs. Code Behind

  Don't allow a history of bad apps in code blocks steer you just because you see the reminding <% “The cat, having sat upon a hot stove lid, will not sit upon a hot stove lid again. But he won't sit upon a cold stove lid, either.” - Mark Twain

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by sodablue on 4/3/2008

• Re: RenderComponent falls short

  I believe I understand what he's trying to do. Essentially it's a dynamically laid out page. Basically like WebParts. So you don't know if you have 1 or 6 user controls, nor what type they are, or what their name is until runtime. I see no way RenderComponent can be used for this, as the type and expression have to be hard coded in at compile time. I can't see any way to create these dynamically at runtime. RenderUserControl would work, as it just takes a string path, and an object

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by sodablue on 3/31/2008

• Re: Code Blocks vs. Code Behind

  I don't quite buy the argument that mixing UI logic with HTML is messy, as Webforms don't really use HTML. You use webcontrols that look like HTML but act differently. What's nice is that by writing out the raw HTML, you have more control over it. I used to have to jump through a lot of hoops to get a datagrid to output the table exactly how I needed it. Especially when you have to write a lot of ugly OnDataBound() event handlers to tweak things, insert bits of javascript, or whatever

  Posted to ASP.NET MVC (Forum) by sodablue on 3/28/2008