You searched for the word(s): userid:105206

More Search Options

RSS Available

• Using The Peer I/O Module Approach in VS2005

  I used the Peer I/O module development approach with much satisfaction in VS 2003. However, with the change in the way web projects work now it's broken. However, with the release of the Web Application Project model , I was able to hack my solution to get it to the way it was. Using the new Web Application Project model, I could discriminately choose to only include default.aspx and web.config in my _DNNStub project. The problem I had, though, is creating the _DNNStub project in the first place

  Posted to Custom Modules (Forum) by davidbarrett on 12/22/2005

• Re: how to develop custom modules in dotnetnuke?

  Bo has a good site explaining how to set up your development environment (if you're using Visual Studio to develop).

  Posted to Custom Modules (Forum) by davidbarrett on 12/22/2005

• Re: Dynamically generated images in a module

  In my humble opinion, using a page object to return images (or any other resource besides a page, for that matter) is expensive. The overhead in creation of the page and the framework that goes along with it doesn't justify it's use. Also, creating an image and saving it to disk with a random name and then using an <img> tag to reference that file seems convoluted to me. Not only that, but you have to deal with file cleanup afterwards. A better option is to use an HttpHandler. First, I must

  Posted to Custom Modules (Forum) by davidbarrett on 12/22/2005

• Re: MinMax persistance type error

  For what it's worth, I've seen this when I have a module defined in the database, but the code objects (the .ascx items) aren't actually in the website. Not sure if that's what's causing your problem or not, but it's worth mentioning.

  Posted to Custom Modules (Forum) by davidbarrett on 12/22/2005

• Re: DiscountASP.NET and the app pool

  By the way, I had the same experience, although in my case, it was not due to the app pool being recycled from memory size extents. As it might have been mentioned above, discountasp.net recycles app pools after 20 minutes of inactivity. Apparently, setting the 'remember me' checkbox isn't enough if the app pool recycles (not sure why this is; don't know the DNN core well enough to verify why this is happening). Regardless, disountasp.net provides a scheduled task function with your hosting account

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by davidbarrett on 8/23/2005

• Re: TTTGallery: Request for bug listing

  Thanks again, everyone. I've added the new items for tracking at my website. I'm going to concentrate on bigfixes first, and new functionality second. BTW, Han, what do you mean by 'an extra sort field where you can put in your own sort number'? David

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by davidbarrett on 10/3/2004

• Re: TTTGallery: Request for bug listing

  jking, Thanks for the clarification. That's what I thought you had meant, but better to be sure than not. ;) David

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by davidbarrett on 10/1/2004

• Re: TTTGallery: Request for bug listing

  Excellent details, everyone. Thanks! I also checked the TTTGallery forums last night and will take anything there that's not listed here. Matt, I'll contact you shortly about the resize algorithm. I believe I fixed this on my old IBS gallery code (the original code was faulty, so Tam just inherited the bug from me), but I want to compare with your code to make sure. I'll be documenting these bugs on my website this weekend and start to work on them then, too. You can get a status there (http://www

  Posted to DotNetNuke (Forum) by davidbarrett on 10/1/2004

• TTTGallery: Request for bug listing

  Hi, all. I am the author of the original IBuySpy media gallery (http://v2.davidbarrett.net/default.aspx?tabid=22) and the source for Tam's derivative TTTGallery. I have recently migrated to DNN from IBS (an old holdout, I know) and am in the process of creating / updating modules for the new website. I talked with Tam earlier in the summer about making some enhancements / bugfixes to his gallery, which I am about to start. Instead of hunting them out myself, I understand there are a few bugs already

  Posted to Custom Modules (Forum) by davidbarrett on 9/30/2004

• Bugs, Solutions, and My Thoughts on the CMAB

  The CMAB is a great concept, but as with anything, the devil is in the details. I've found a few bugs and want to second a few things others have found. First, there is an inconsistency between the out-of-the-box XmlFileStorage and SqlStorage classes. Implementation behavior is slightly different between the two in the IConfigurationStorageReader.Read implementation method. Let me explain. The XmlFileStorage concrete will check the contents of the configSection before it returns anything to XMLSerializerSectionHandler

  Posted to Microsoft Application Blocks (Forum) by davidbarrett on 8/27/2004