<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://forums.asp.net/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Migrating from ASP.NET 1.x to ASP.NET 2.0</title><link>http://forums.asp.net/180.aspx</link><description>Discuss issues about compatibility with and migration from previous versions of ASP.NET.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP1 (Build: 20510.895)</generator><item><title>Re: Web user control (.ascx )  VS  page (.aspx)</title><link>http://forums.asp.net/thread/3173442.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:30:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4c671506-2930-414c-a40b-8bf57ded5924:3173442</guid><dc:creator>mpakala</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://forums.asp.net/thread/3173442.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://forums.asp.net/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=180&amp;PostID=3173442</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the suggestions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;I do realize the justification of using user controls. But in th older application (1.1) pages were converted to web controls ascx so that we can mimic a master page which was not available at that point. So not all the&amp;nbsp;web user controls are being re-used.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems to be a &amp;nbsp;wrong design decision to use user controls when there is no intention to re-use them.&amp;nbsp; Also dynamic user controls and the interaction with the page life-cycle is kind of tricky from some of the articles I have read before.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So&amp;nbsp;my question is really, if there is&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;design or overhead&amp;nbsp;issue by&amp;nbsp; using .user controls to mimic a master page ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kiran&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Web user control (.ascx )  VS  page (.aspx)</title><link>http://forums.asp.net/thread/3173413.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:17:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4c671506-2930-414c-a40b-8bf57ded5924:3173413</guid><dc:creator>chrisri</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://forums.asp.net/thread/3173413.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://forums.asp.net/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=180&amp;PostID=3173413</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;It really depends on your goals for the migration. The architecture you have will continue to work in ASP.NET 2.0 without having to change. ASP.NET still supports ascx controls. The master/content page model was created to make implementing the scenario you have a bit easier, but it doesn&amp;#39;t replace ascx controls.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So if you just want to get the application running on 2.0 without major revisions, you can leave things alone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you are migrating with the goal of taking advantage of 2.0 features, then you can consider making the changes. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Web user control (.ascx )  VS  page (.aspx)</title><link>http://forums.asp.net/thread/3173228.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 17:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4c671506-2930-414c-a40b-8bf57ded5924:3173228</guid><dc:creator>Narmatha Balasundaram</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://forums.asp.net/thread/3173228.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://forums.asp.net/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=180&amp;PostID=3173228</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;The difference between User Control and Master Pages has discussed in these links - &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://forums.asp.net/p/1127159/1777521.aspx#1777521" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums.asp.net/p/1127159/1777521.aspx#1777521&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.allinterview.com/showanswers/36311.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.allinterview.com/showanswers/36311.html&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Web user control (.ascx )  VS  page (.aspx)</title><link>http://forums.asp.net/thread/3172981.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 15:40:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">4c671506-2930-414c-a40b-8bf57ded5924:3172981</guid><dc:creator>mpakala</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://forums.asp.net/thread/3172981.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://forums.asp.net/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=180&amp;PostID=3172981</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;We are converting a 1.1 application to 2.0. The application used web user controls extensively for header, footer and all the other content common across the application.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a single page which has a place holder analogous to content place&amp;nbsp;holder in master pages&amp;nbsp; and logic is written to toggle between&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;the controls based on the required functionality.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since 2.0 has master pages is it necessary to convert all the .ascx to .aspx&amp;nbsp;? In other words is there&amp;nbsp;an issue using dynamic user controls&amp;nbsp; since we can change that design using the new master pages?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please advice.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kiran&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>