We've thought about it, but it's not a very high priority for us right now as it would change our controller caching and invocation systems in a non-trivial manner. We're playing around with systems that would allow more dynamic selection of controllers
and actions beyond what a [ControllerName] attribute could accomplish, but there's nothing yet to report on that front.
There's a workaround for what you wanted:
public class FriendlyNameController : MyReallyReallyLongControllerNameController { }
levib
Star
7702 Points
1099 Posts
Microsoft
Re: short hand name attribute for controller?
Feb 01, 2010 10:56 PM|LINK
We've thought about it, but it's not a very high priority for us right now as it would change our controller caching and invocation systems in a non-trivial manner. We're playing around with systems that would allow more dynamic selection of controllers and actions beyond what a [ControllerName] attribute could accomplish, but there's nothing yet to report on that front.
There's a workaround for what you wanted:
public class FriendlyNameController : MyReallyReallyLongControllerNameController { }