t just occured to me that I effectively implemented Server.Execute for MVC (and in case if you are wondering, the regular Server.Execute is tied to the webform model it appears).
I believe Execute() will work well. however I am wondering if Execute() is not that lightweight enough? ( I mean it may have too many overhead from inside of Execute, and it would be better to have a light weight one)
shinakuma
I would like to hear some opinions from the dev team on whether "render_component" has any place in the mvc framework. Seems to me that this is really no different from ajax calls as far as the amount of work the server has to do.
Me too.
I believe the problem we discuss here is quite common in a "real" web application.
mave99a
Member
2 Points
8 Posts
Re: How about a very complex page which need many "MVC modules/parts" ?
Dec 21, 2007 09:03 PM|LINK
I believe Execute() will work well. however I am wondering if Execute() is not that lightweight enough? ( I mean it may have too many overhead from inside of Execute, and it would be better to have a light weight one)
Me too.
I believe the problem we discuss here is quite common in a "real" web application.