Ok. Well I now see where the bug is. The container assignment at
the administrative and host level doesn't work properly. If I put
a 'Container' folder in the [dnnfolder]/portals/0 folder, and then put
a 'mycontainers' folder off of that. It screws up the path.
It's *supposed* to look at the [L] and see this is a portal container,
but it doesn't. Instead it points to the _default folder.
Even worse, it adds an extra '/[dnnfolder]' *AFTER* the '...Containers'
folder.
If this was a bug (and it sure looks like one to me, all I did was use
apply a container I could *see*), I sure wish someone would have told
me two weeks
ago. At least I know how to fix it now, but I guess I should wait
before I put this version of DNN into production. Me thinks there
are still a few glitches to work out...either that or I don't know
what. If I saved this portal, and then upgrade the actual site
w/3.0.13 and then apply this exported portal, will this problem happen
again?
And I truly thank you Jan for your help. Seems like if it wasn't
for you, I'd be awful lonely with this question around my neck.
Oh yeah, for anyone that's wondering. To fix this you need to
query your database, or open it in Enterprise Manager (for MSSQL
anyway), and open the 'Skins' table. There you'll see the list of
Skins you've assigned at the host and portal level. If it's
empty, then you are using the default skin (or have a Skin assignment
for each page/module). If it has an [L] at the beginning, then
it's a *portal* skin/container, and will have a path that includes the
portal assigned that skin/container. If it has a ['G'] (had to
insert single quotes in here or it displays a gift icon) in the
front, then it's a host level assigned skin or container, and the path
should have the '_default' folder in it. But somewhere in the
assignment code, it's futzing this path up. Where, I have no clue.