I'm not a noob, been at this since the beginning. There's absolutely no reason this can't be implemented in debug mode, + it would save a lot of us a great deal of time during development.
..to the list of interesting nonsense I've come across while optimising my .net 3.5 sites - This one happens when I merge large amounts of .dlls with the ILMERGE tool. Great.
Still a huge fan of 3.5 - mainly due to Generics & Linq.
newbie2C#
Member
694 Points
1179 Posts
Re: No more: "Object reference not set to an instance of an object."
Apr 01, 2010 11:56 PM|LINK
This is an interesting post. SGWellens, why do you think this suggestion isn't implemented yet?
hitchhiker99...
Member
14 Points
15 Posts
Re: No more: "Object reference not set to an instance of an object."
Apr 10, 2010 05:11 PM|LINK
(no answer I guess..)
I'm not a noob, been at this since the beginning. There's absolutely no reason this can't be implemented in debug mode, + it would save a lot of us a great deal of time during development.
OT: May I just add:
Operation could destabilize the runtime.
<div style="clear: both;" mce_style="clear:both;"></div>..to the list of interesting nonsense I've come across while optimising my .net 3.5 sites - This one happens when I merge large amounts of .dlls with the ILMERGE tool. Great.
Still a huge fan of 3.5 - mainly due to Generics & Linq.